this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
101 points (96.3% liked)

Unexpected Factorial

123 readers
4 users here now

When you use an exclamation mark with a number, you’re actually implying it’s not a normal number any more. It’s a factorial!

Ok, so how does this work?

5!=1×2×3×4×5=120

6!=720

These numbers get really large. For example:

15!≈1.3×10^12

So, next time you see a headline with 2000! in it, you’ll know what to expect.

There are also double factorials (n!!) and iterated factorials (n!)!, and they aren’t the same thing. Just add more exclamation marks and you get multifactorial. Check wikipedia to see how spicy it gets.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also, neat trick: If you need to add numbers higher than 10 you can take your shoes off to be able to do so.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Pfft, amateur hour. I count to eleven without taking my shoes off all the time.

Just not at my kid's school any more.

[–] mumblerfish 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When lecturing I used to take my shoes off. I was asked about it once and said, which is true, it was because I was nervous and it helped my anxiety. But I should have used this as my reply.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This is applicable to 9, e.g. 27 -> 2+7=9 -> divisible by 9

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

One of the rare cases when a factorial doesn’t lead to an absurdly huge figure. If that had been something like a “divisible by 12! rule” it would have been a lot spicier.

[–] Etterra 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And people wonder why an American politician wanted to change π to be 3. Gawd our country sucks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

π=3

Source: Mahajan, S. (2014). The art of insight in science and engineering: Mastering complexity. The MIT Press. p. 18.

That page is also a goldmine for of numbers you can use for back of the envelope maths or trolling professionals of various kinds. Are you working with chemists? N_A=6 * 10^23 mol^-1 What about physicists then? c=3 * 10^8 m/s.