Killbot industry: "We would never let a machine make the final decision. There'll always be a human element involved"
Human element:
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
125 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
34968 readers
36 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The homeopathy of ethical compliance
If abortion is banned because a cell cluster is human, this should be banned too
As if it ever was about the cluster of cells and not the oppression of others...
But now we can technologically enforce the oppression! Isn't that great? You'll be implanted with the birthwisher 4000 so you won't even know, that you don't want to carry the product of rape in your womb!
I think a large number of conservative Christians would find this abhorrent, but they are unlikely to know about it. If their sources do report on it the democrats will likely be blamed.
I feel like this was the origin story for the computer in I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream.
It’s more like the origin story for the Cymeks in Dune. Although they were at least human once.
People worry about AI taking over the world when it will probably be human machine hybrids deciding ‘yeah fuck humans’ in their giant killer Mechs.
So if the paddle hit the ball, the cells would receive a nice, predictable stimulus. But if it missed, the cells would get four seconds of totally unpredictable stimulation.
Ah yes, my second step after building biological AI is definitely "torture it". This is sure to end well.
Dudun Dun Dudum. Dudun Dun Dudum.
Why can't we get Jurassic Park before biological AI?
Dinosaurs, while neat, do not bring sufficient profits for the offense industry.
I'd like to see how the Russians handle raptors.
This is fine
I still feel that silicone is more reliable than dealing with organic matter that can die.
How do they keep it alive. Do you need to feed it or keep it in special conditions? With time, as the cells age, would you lose performance?
Once a bunch of nuclear warheads enter puberty we’re all fucked.
Aw sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension.
This has both more potential and more pure horror than any of the bland AI stuff we've been obsessing over.
That's why we need science fiction, to not be afraid of all the abhorrent and abhorrently efficient weapons the future holds for us.
And yes, Star Wars is a very perceptive choice of name on part of George Lucas.
The scary part is that we all sit on our sweaty bottoms while such things are being developed not by bad guys and good guys to fight each other over us, but by bad guys and bad guys to fight each other over us.
idk man, at no point do any two or more stars fight each other /s
of course the military is interested in this... god.
We're really trying to find a way to boost LLM performance, huh
I'm pretty sure if you just search the term "cyberpunk" you'd find at least five stories that start like this.
I wonder, at the point where it’s neurons making up a very small piece of tissue, what benefit human cells give over something like a pig (the article does say human and mouse, but still).
It was scary stuff, but radically advanced. I mean, it was smashed, it didn't work, but...it gave us ideas, took us in new directions. I mean, things we would have never...All my work was based on it. -- Miles Dyson, Terminator 2: Judgement Day
Great, but concerning...
I'm aware that we're currently capable of reading the mind to some limited extent, using MRI-like machines and machine learning models trained on certain brain signals, but being able to literally utilise a brain for 'arbitrary' processing is on another level entirely 😳
I wonder what else this is capable of doing or running, and the expected shelf life in particular, seeing as it's basically biological matter that I'm assuming can age.
Let's hope these researchers keep things responsible and don't try to run a text generation model on it 😅 /s
I don't know if you understand what military funded means... It's basically the military paying these guys to make something they can use in the military.
There is no doubt in my mind at least that all cute robots, useful AI, and other new things are just the public tip of the iceberg kind of a thing, to make people think it's something positive and not be afraid.
The most advanced things will be used by law enforcement and military to control and monitor the populations.
So while I like tech, I'm also convinced that humans are going to use it to make the planet horrible to live on, to the degree that "don't get children" is the best advice ever.
My name is Alex James Murphy
That was kinda the other way round. But it's set in 2028... So maybe.
So they want to make Servitor AI ?
Praise the Omnissiah!
Reminds me of this video
Edit: also this one
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/V2YDApNRK3g
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
The thought emporium has a great series of videos of the work they are doing related to this.
view more: next ›