this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
97 points (96.2% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2926 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not for long enough. She knowingly let criminals and terrorists launder money through the bank.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not really what this is about, from reading the article. That is, the charges are not for the laundering itself.

Rather, they are for making misleading statements in two interviews that caused investors to over-value the bank, which exposed then to loss.

But to mislead is not enough to commit swindling, Johannisson stressed. What made the difference is the financial damage that her misleading statements caused. 

When Swedish Television’s investigative flagship “Mission: Investigate” later published leaked information showing suspicious clients funneling tens of billions of dollars through the bank, Swedbank’s share plunged on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, resulting in substantial losses for the shareholders.

The case has not been about whether money was actually found to be laundered through the bank, but how the CEO claimed that the bank handled such apparent risk.

This particular sentence isn't aimed at deterring banks from laundering money. I don't even know if the CEO is personally criminally liable for that. It's aimed at deterring people running companies from making statements about them that would mislead investors. Important if you want your country to be a desirable place to do investment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

so her fault was fucking with rich people's money, not doing what caused actual societal harm, got it. see also: martin shkreli

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

So she will have an easier time in prison since they all like her?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 1 week ago

The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP):

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.occrp.org/en/news/swedish-court-sends-ex-ceo-of-swedbank-to-prison
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support