this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
9 points (90.9% liked)

Bay Area

1345 readers
2 users here now

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've done 2 months personally (first and last), but most of my places have done 1 month. 3 is insane.

What has everyone else been seeing?

all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sambeastie 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everywhere I've lived except my current place has wanted First + Last as a deposit. Current place just wanted one month.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

The apartment I used to live at only wanted a $500 deposit - rent was around $3300/month. This was an apartment complex owned by a large company (Equity Residential) so honestly it confused me as I thought they'd try to squeeze as much money as possible from tenants. They did that for rent increases - the increases were always the maximum allowed by law (5% + CPI, capped at 10%), down to the cent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

2 months is pretty typical, and 1 is not long enough to cover the cost of an eviction.

If you prevent landlords from taking a deposit big enough to cover the real cost of a bad tenant, they will protect themselves by discriminating against rental applicants.