this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
92 points (93.4% liked)

World News

39350 readers
3631 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RegalPotoo 38 points 3 months ago

Tbh, given how out of their way IBM went to enable the holocaust, I don't think they really should be weighing in on this one

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

We try to operate with the principles that are encouraged by the governments of the countries we are in. We are a U.S. headquarter company. So, what does the U.S. federal government want to do on international relations? That helps guide a lot of what we do. We operate in many countries. We operate in Israel, but we also operate in Saudi Arabia. What do those countries want us to do? And what is it they consider to be correct behavior?

Who's to say genocide(or anything for that matter) is bad when we can enhance shareholder value?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Genocides never been an issue with IBM.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

One might say it's their cornerstone.

[–] lightscription 1 points 3 months ago

They made a mistake. As history proves, a big one. But any technical company could. So did the makers of cyclon. Apple or Windows could. The AI could exterminate us all as useless humans with low worth. The values of the current CEO should matter if they translate into real world policies, such as, defending human rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

According to the Global Slavery Index 2023, an estimated 21.3 in every thousand people were in modern slavery in Saudi Arabia at any point in 2021. In other words, 740,000 people experienced forced labour or forced marriage in Saudi Arabia in 2020. Saudi Arabia ranks 4th globally and 1st within the Arab States.

This is considered correct behavior so we see no issue, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I kind of get the idea.

It's not [company's] role to change the way [country] operates. But [company] can choose to not operate in [country].

IBM's chief executive psychopath obviously had this explained to him but stopped listening half way through.

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is extremely similar to Elon Musk's "clarification" on what he means by free speech:

[–] cmhe 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Right, they saying "We are just following the law." as if that was an apolitical statement. While they still get to choose whom laws to follow by deciding where to make business, which are political decisions.

As you see with Twitter or starlink, they decided to be do business in Brazil, but when the country actually have laws against uncontrolled mass propaganda and hate speech, they are suddenly against the law, and do not try to stop or limit doing their business there, when they do not want or can't abide by these laws.

[–] symthetics 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Jesus could he be more vague and incoherent?

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That was the point. He was defending his deleting posts and accounts at the behest of Turkey and India. Suddenly he had to come up with some reason why his claim of supposed free speech absolutism wasn't all that absolute.

[–] symthetics 3 points 3 months ago

Ah, makes sense. I wonder how long he can slither around like this until it finally bites him hard.

[–] Mrkawfee 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow he really is a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For many workers, the question of where IBM might draw the line with foreign governments is particularly fraught given the company’s grim track record of selling computers and services to both apartheid South Africa and Nazi Germany.

[–] answersplease77 2 points 3 months ago

Oh, so I think what he means by "correct behavior" is "good cash"

[–] sleepmode 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Arvind regularly makes it clear in meetings that he doesn’t give a flying flip what the employees think or feel and that he knows best. So this is not shocking. He’s made similar bootlicker comments before. I’m sort of surprised more of his terrible takes aren’t made public.

[–] Stiffneckedppl 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I miss Ginni! She was so much better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The shareholders disagree seeing the stock prices... I do though, she was more human.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I can confirm the same as well. I left IBM in part because of him. The more he spoke, the less I felt like an IBMer.

I'm surprised too that he has not gone viral yet on his takes.