A whole lot more co-operation and less traumatized children.
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
22 points (84.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43899 readers
1188 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Except, I don't share the same values as my neighbors, and either I would be upsetting the neighbor by how I'm 'parenting' their kids, or they will be upsetting me with how they 'parent' mine.
I was thinking more along the lines of what those children would grow up with. They would end up becoming adults who understood trust and cooperation at a whole other level.
I think the point of co-operative/collaborative parenting would be for the group to agree on how to raise the children. You collectively raise the children, not each adult implementing their own rules/methods. When you have differing opinions, you would most likely compromise and come to a common ground. The whole point of working together is to operate as a group to reduce the workload and not work in isolation.
Much more confusion but also much less child abuse considering there are more filters for abuse-causing factors to have to go through.
I know a lot of victims of such calamity. "Oh don't worry I'll take care of it" says a single parent or pair of parents before going full good-for-nothing on them.
One can say what they want about sovereignty over their kin, but people are responsible for collateral damages too. As it stands, I wouldn't dare become a mom.
It would look like a lot of free baby sitting. Where do I sign up?
Like most questions that devolve to, "What would the world be like if people stopped doing bad things and just ?" pretty great. (The wish in this case is help each other with raising children.) Now if only we could get people to stop doing bad things.
How are people answering this "question?"
It is a jumble of gibberish, how are you people getting any meaning from this?
If the whole world "went by"????? What like the end of the world or something???
It takes a village to raise a child...theorem???? What the fuck are you on about?
And then randomly saying not the individual but the world as a whole???? In what context??? Speak English dammit!
What would the world look like??? After what!? Nothing preceding this question makes sense! What the fuck!?
Did the people giving answers share this guy's brain aneurysm or something???
Given that many of us who are american went to the public indoctination centers... I mean schools where we were "raised" by people in our "village", I think it would look basically the same as it like it does now.
Unless you are talking about a world devoid of the educational industrial complex.