this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
32 points (79.6% liked)

Transfem

3355 readers
9 users here now

A community for transfeminine people and experiences.

This is a supportive community for all transfeminine or questioning people. Anyone is welcome to participate in this community but disrupting the safety of this space for trans feminine people is unacceptable and will result in moderator action.

Debate surrounding transgender rights or acceptance will result in an immediate ban.

Posters may express that they are looking for responses and support from groups with certain experiences (eg. trans people, trans people with supportive parents, trans parents.). Please respect those requests and be mindful that your experience may differ from others here.

To make such a request, at the start of the body of your post, not in the title, the first line should look like the this: [Requesting Engagement from _________]

Some helpful links:

Support Hotlines:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I know this is probably a (relatively) unpopular opinion, but at this point, I'll gladly take passive acceptance over flat out, literally express genocide against trans people.

Straight up, it suck not being positively supported, but it's a hell of a lot better than being threatened with prison time-definitely in the wrong one! 😱

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

Same same. I also really don't care that during an election people are trying to get votes and not discussing the most contentious issues. They can do that when they're in power, thank you very much.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

We should never have to accept being a side issue. It should categorically be unacceptable for the political party that is protecting our rights to show passivity in the face of what is happening to us.

I don't believe that being passive on trans issues benefits them whatsoever in terms of votes. Transphobia in the US is closely aligned with American neo fascism. Transphobes are never going to vote Democrat. So what is gained by being silent about us? Like materially, how is that a good political move? All it does is make their support for minority rights seem vacant. Trump and his ilk show up to rallies and rant and rave about us. About how we're demons. How we're vile and repulsive and how we should be ostracized and ridiculed and locked away from society.

And the Democrat response at the DNC is to say nothing? How can that be a good political move? And what does that say to the American people about trans people? Our rights aren't worth any vocal pushback. Obviously, a platform of passive acceptance is better than a platform of hate. But our rights matter, and our suffering matters. Progressive politicians should be actively pushing back as much as possible against the transphobic platform of the republican party.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Be glad you're not in the UK. Here all major parties are worse than US Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not really. The current ruling party (Labour) are pretty crap but nothing compared to the openly genocidal US Republicans. And the 3rd largest party (Liberal Democrats) are pretty socially progressive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Meh, they're really just way more polite about it. Both have the same policy of banning gender affirming care for trans folks.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

So, we're just going to ignore the specific mentions in their platform?

[–] LovingHippieCat 12 points 4 weeks ago

I think it's more that people wanted a trans speaker or for people to speak about it directly. People are more interested in speeches than reading through the platform. Which I think is crazy since it very clearly outlines their intentions to defend us trans folk. But in the days of social media and sound clips, if you don't have a speaker mentioning it directly, it doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Platforms are meanless, it's an outlet for activist that politicians can & do completely ignore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago