this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
269 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59388 readers
3706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewta 69 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Easy solution. Don't plug the tv into the internet.

Use it basically as a monitor. 🖕To the tv makers

[–] Iheartcheese 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Then how would I run my private Plex server?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Run Jellyfin instead. I don't know how Plex has stayed as popular as it has.

[–] cm0002 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Easy, Plex can pass the spouse test. Jellyfin has yet to pass the spouse test...it's getting there though

[–] HarriPotero 8 points 2 months ago

My spouse has switched from Plex to Jellyfin

Maybe it's time to try again? Or consider another spouse?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I tried Jellyfin and the performance for me was sooo much worse than Plex on the same system. Videos took forever to play. Also Plex is way easier for me to share with family than Jellyfin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

You can check to see if you can enable hardware transcoding. I find the delay is usually transcoding building up a buffer and if you have a good GPU/APU in your server it's often a lot quicker.

Pretty sure on jellyfin by default that is off. Mainly because you need to install some packages to get the devices available under linux usually.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

If you were playing videos with subtitles on android, you might have run into the slow subtitle burn in bug.

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/11938

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Because it's straight better lol

[–] MisterMoo 11 points 2 months ago

I have a private Plex server and all TVs disconnected from the internet. What does one have to do with the other?

[–] thehatfox 7 points 2 months ago

Isolate the smart TV in restricted VLAN in your home network that can access your local media server but doesn’t allow internet access.

Segmenting a home network like this is also a good idea for smart home/IoT devices.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not seeing any replies that are super helpful for your question - so here's what I do: throw a Linux desktop on a Raspberry Pi, or NUC and use the TV like monitor. Get a wireless keyboard/mouse combo and watch Plex through the appimage or just Firefox. Bonus, now any website that does video can be viewed on your big screen tv without dealing with any casting apps.

[–] ANIMATEK 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Downvoted for what?

I recommend either an AppleTV to watch WEB-DL or a Nvidia Shield Pro for REMUX if you don't have a Samsung TV; otherwise a Zidoo.

[–] pdxfed 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have no cable and my TV isn't hooked to anything except a Chromecast so I can stream to it. Can TVs send stuff out over Chromecast? I feel like it's no but?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

No.

HDMI does have a feature called Ethernet over HDMI that in theory could allow that.

Thing is though it’s literally never been implemented in anything. It died because cheap WiFi became common.

For it to work you’d need both the TV and Chromecast and HDMI cable all to support it. It’s not uncommon on cables and a surprising amount of them include it in features list (probably to trick low info people).

But I believe that’s a hardware design thing so not something even a software update could enable. It costs extra money and they’re already paying for a WiFi chip so why bother?

[–] eronth 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'm not looking forward to replacing my dumb tv when it finally dies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Just don't connect it to the internet. I play everything from an HTPC, LG gots zero data from me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Don't sweat it. Just get what's on sale.

They're all the same.

There's only one reason I'd opt for a high priced name brand. And that's the ability to apply filters to everything you're watching.

Imagine watching Ace Ventura but every character has the Chad Face filter on.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A few ideas to consider in this kind of situation:

If you watch broadcast TV, consider stopping. Is it really of any use? Could your time have better uses? Maybe you'll never need that ad stream.

If all you need is a display for console/computer/media box, get a display instead. No tuner, no networking, no ads.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't make 77" monitors

[–] Passerby6497 -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At that point, just get a projector. You can have whatever size you can fit and the picture is still decent as long as you're not in direct sunlight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Projectors can't compete with an OLED on picture quality. All of the good projectors run Android TV anyways...

[–] bcoffy 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have a google tv, and the “Basic Mode” when you set it up or the “Apps only mode” both are a lot better than the overstimulation nightmare that is most smart TVs (and a google TV with normal settings)

[–] BroBot9000 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Still might want to monitor how many packets the tv sends back to Google and block them.

[–] bcoffy 1 points 2 months ago

Agreed, I should probably check that with my pi-hole.

[–] thehatfox 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the inevitable path for nearly all proprietary smart devices. There’s a handful of manufacturers that will see privacy as a marketable feature, but most won’t be able to resist the sweet taste of data.

It’s a shame there are no “dumb” TVs left, except for expensive industrial options.

[–] sfxrlz 3 points 2 months ago

The dumb ones last forever though. My parents are still running the tv my aunt deemed too big in 2008ish, which she must’ve been owning for a few years at that point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apple TV is a bit pricey, but at least it’s ad-free. Connect it to a modern TV without internet access, stream your Jellyfin (or Plex) media via Infuse and you are good to go.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

$130 menu price but regularly goes on sale for $99. Still not cheap (especially compared to the "free" ad platform built in to the TV) but lessens the sting a bit. And much less likely to be abandoned by its manufacturer and get exploited.

[–] FlavoredButtHair 5 points 2 months ago

Not with pihole and other ad-blocking measures.

[–] SirSoy 3 points 2 months ago

Ok so honestly I cut the cable years ago. There's a product called Tablo it's an OTA tuner & DVR pair this with a Roku and choose a streaming service for the extras you want and... For the love of God spend the money on a projector. For some reason projectors are missing all the advertising bullshit that's baked into modern tv's and please just game on a 32 inch 4-8k monitor instead of a TV something with a good response time instead of your laggy ass 40+inch TV.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Sailing the seas until they stop trying to fck me in the ars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Jokes on you. The only TV I own is over 30 years old.

[–] disconnectikacio 1 points 2 months ago