this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
4 points (75.0% liked)

New York Times

43 readers
145 users here now

The newspaper of record.

Don't post archive.is links or full text of articles, you will receive a temp ban.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Thrashy 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Key line right here, sneakily hidden below the fold:

Collectors who view artworks as financial assets have flinched at the rising costs of doing business and the diminished ability to get favorable loans to buy paintings they hope will appreciate in value.

Like everything else in the world, ghouls financialized the art market and have been buying art on fucking margin as though an object of creative expression can be treated like soybean futures. In truth the art market has been the subject of an absurd speculative bubble. The fallout of the bubble popping is going to be hilarious for the wealthy assholes who've been inflating it for years, but it is gonna suck for artists too, and I do feel badly for them.