this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
30 points (84.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7239 readers
559 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

Polls are shit, have a plan and get out and vote.

VOTE!!!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

No they didn't. They had Hillary with something like a 60% chance of winning. That's not "had Hillary beating Trump" that's "Hillary was more likely to win than Trump."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I dont have proof, but I believe it was a hell of a lot higher than 60%

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It was. IIRC, it got up to almost 90% in mid October. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It wasn't 100%. It's a forecast not a premonition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, Jan

You know how the internet works, right?

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

Don’t miss the forest for the trees. The point being— polls are shit 💩

GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You know how probability works right? No, of course you don't. Almost nobody does...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some of us play XCOM, 95% chance to hit might as well be 0% when you need 100%, usually means it's time for a grenade.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Hah! Excellent example. 😆

[–] TheEtherBunny 11 points 3 months ago

The very idea that 50% of any uncontrived sample of people in the USA would vote for that compulsively lying wannabe dick-tater is appalling.