this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
135 points (96.6% liked)

Vintage and Retro Ads, Promos, Fliers, Etc.

542 readers
113 users here now

For sharing images of vintage magazine ads, fliers, promos, etc.

We're going to play it pretty loose with timeframe here so please don't get offended anyone :)

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

#General motors #car #automobile

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They had that then, trains.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Also, roads

[–] lettruthout 8 points 1 month ago

For years, even before GPS, other drivers have been telling me where to go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

this is really cool, honestly I wish this had become mainstream instead of GPS, it would have made the conversion to automated vehicles so much easier. Instead of having to worry about pathing the system could have worked using the address system linked directly to the road, the only thing it would need is cameras to be sure it won't collide with anything, positioning could be via the antenna instead of the wildly inaccurate GPS, plus it would work in tunnels/heavy metal areas. That being said, price wise this would be a far more expensive startup price

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What happens if the car deviates from the path?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Since pathing would be decided by the antenna signals in the road, it /shouldn't/ but it would need to act the same as how current assistive tech would work, which would be swap to manual drive with an alert or pull off to the side.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Dunno man, but that is why we still need a driver.

[–] toxicbubble 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but how would Google insert ads & features you don't need?

[–] AnUnusualRelic 6 points 1 month ago

Roadside signs. Simple.

[–] Ptsf 5 points 1 month ago

This would've been massively underfunded, underdeveloped, and broken. They can't even get potholes handled, no way they're managing millions of radio transcievers haha.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is that high tech place on road are more easily stolen (by hobo) than thing high up in the sky.

[–] rollmagma 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

oh yeah, poor people are always the problem

[–] skyspydude1 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, someone like Elon Musk (probably) isn't stealing the copper from charging stations to fund his drug habits, the ultra-wealthy have far more efficient ways of stealing from society. People being desperate enough to steal wiring from infrastructure is definitely a problem, even if it's a symptom of greater issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

yeah man, that is how rich people always think. Luckily, most policy maker are rich. So do investors.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I do agree, it would be a theft risk, I believe it would work best with the antenna actually being in the road instead of above it to remove risk factors, but you also lose range doing that, since something like that would likely be passive not active to avoid requiring a power source, although active would be better but again, $$

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah, that's what traffic signs are for bro

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Some bro don't like to read traffic sign and want the car read for them.

[–] lettruthout 3 points 1 month ago

'Love the AM radio!

[–] NarrativeBear 1 points 1 month ago

Very similar to what google maps is with your smartphone on your dash while you drive. Guess the only think the article did not predict was voice commands and feedback.