this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
20 points (77.8% liked)

Videos

14409 readers
497 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptainSpaceman 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Interesting stuff!

Theres early christian iconography revolving around mushrooms as well, so ive wondered if the "forbidden fruit" aka "fruit of knowledge" was originally a psilocybin mushroom.

[–] specialistdrunk 2 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a JRE episode

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nobody calls mushrooms fruit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

The head of a mushroom is a fruiting body. I know that is a huge distinction but could be confused pretty easily. Especially if there is some translation fun between.

[–] CaptainSpaceman 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Metaphors exist.

Unless youre trying to tell me everything in the bible is literal?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unless youre trying to tell me everything in the bible is literal?

Obviously not. But that's not a metaphor. That's just using the wrong word.

[–] CaptainSpaceman 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you consulted the author?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, but like, a metaphor is when there's some second meaning. Why would you call a mushroom a fruit? Especially since none of this was in English anyway and so there's no way of knowing if any secondary meanings of the word would have also made any sense poetically.

[–] CaptainSpaceman 0 points 5 months ago

You're a mushroom.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Regarding Latin malum: people often have the impression that the word specifically means "apple" due to a bunch of crappy Latin textbooks. It's messier though, and the video is correct - it could be used to refer to any type of fruit, although in the absence of context you'd "default" to apples. This can be shown through synchronic evidence, like Apicius 4.3.4:

4. MINUTAL MATIANUM. [...] Media coctura mala matiana purgata intrinsecs concisa tessellatim mittes. [...]
4. Matian Mince. [...] While cooking, add [to the pot] Matian fruits (=apples) that had their cores removed and cut into pieces.

If "mala" was enough to refer to apples, why is the author specifying that those need to be "mala matiana"?

Diachronic evidence shows the same. Using Portuguese for the examples:

  • mala matiana "Mattius' fruit(s)" → maçã "apple"
  • mala romana "Roman fruit(s)" → romã "pomegranate"

If "mala" was used exclusively for apples the first one wouldn't get an adjective, just like in Apicius' recipe book; and the later would've never popped up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Interesting video. I think I've heard of it as an apple growing up in a Christian household.

Semi related, but I enjoy the Gnostic interpretation of the Forbidden Fruit story, in which the Serpent (aka Lucifer) tempts Eve with the fruit of knowledge to achieve Gnosis, so she may learn the true meaning of their existence (the understanding that God is not their true creator). This paints Lucifer as the hero and God, or Yaldabaoth in Gnosticism, as the villain.

[–] HootinNHollerin -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That’s some ai generated bullshit cover photo. Therefore no way wasting time watching it

[–] amotio 0 points 5 months ago

How does this cover differ from someone making it in photoshop (like most covers)? AI is in this case just useful tool IMO.