this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
81 points (96.6% liked)

Tesla

189 readers
1 users here now

The Tesla community of lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chris Ailman, chief of one of the largest pension funds in the US, says he will vote against package

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He is more of a liability than an asset at this point.

[–] SonyJunkie 6 points 6 months ago

I agree, at this point he's holding Tesla back.

Their range of cars has become stale and outdated. His vanity project, the Cybertruck, is a disaster, the Model S and X aren't selling and the Y isn't getting a refresh anytime soon. Tesla can't continue on just the Model 3 sales. They need to compete with the established manufacturers who are now getting their act together when it comes to EVs and also acknowledge that the Chinese EVs are viable alternatives.

Tesla need a small SUV and small compact, it's what people want.

[–] Reddfugee42 4 points 6 months ago

He's like, if I don't get this, I'll leave!

Fucking promise? People may start buying Tesla again

[–] homesweethomeMrL 19 points 6 months ago

So say all of us

[–] just_change_it 10 points 6 months ago

The guy just wants shareholders other than himself to bear the brunt of his foolish purchase of x. that's all this is.

He doesn't want to live with his mistake. He wants his cake and to eat it too.

[–] Anticorp 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Doesn't he hold the majority of the shares? Why even have a vote if that's the case.

Edit: I looked it up. He owns 20.5% of the shares, so definitely vote! Vote against this idiot.

[–] cosmicrookie 5 points 6 months ago

If his companies made any money, one could argue that it may be ok. But he's not making money for others than himself