WHO CARES if the most Influential Justice in America HATES half of us so much that he and his wife would LITERALLY FIGHT US because of our Politics? It's not like he's REWRITING LAWS that Congress already passed!
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19149 readers
3529 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It’s pretty absurd that Alito can’t even get his fuckin’ story straight.
If he weren't a judge, one whiff of this would be enough to eliminate him from any jury in the country. Just on the basis of craziness and bad judgement, he should resign.
What a cunt.
So now we know that "vulgarity" is what he named his penis.
The SCOTUS is consistently demonstrating that they are political actors and illegitimate as jurists.
We should pack the court with ethical peoe until the corruption is under 10%. If that means 20 jurists... So be it.
I've had enough and now stare decisis can't be defended. Not when corruption is making decisions AND overriding previous well decided decisions.
Is it me, or is the headline misleading? This article doesnt challenge Alito's timeline, it confirms it.
The headline doesn't challenge Alito's timeline. How is it misleading? It adequately summarizes the core of the article:
- The Alitos fly upside-down US flag.
- Neighbors report rude behavior from Martha-Ann Alito.
But the neighbors had signs up before the flag, which they could claim it was in response to. Claim is of course the key word.