this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
217 points (98.2% liked)

interestingasfuck

764 readers
17 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditWanderer 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's a statue in Dachau concentration camp of an emaciated man that reads something like: "In memory of the dead and a warning to the living".

It seems we have ignored both warnings.

[–] Winter8593 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Wait there was a nuclear test less than a year ago?

Edit: Wikipedia says the most recent test was on 2017/09/03, ~~making this photo taken on 2018/04/01~~

Edit 2: I found the article this photo is from with more context. TL:DR it was reset back in 2022 bc the US conducted two clandestine tests.

[–] macarthur_park 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t call the US tests “clandestine”. They’re subcritical, meaning they don’t generate any nuclear yield. They also report when they do these in the annual NNSA reports.

[–] flicker 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, if clandestine, how on clock?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They learned of it after it happened per the article.

[–] errer 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting, they were “sub critical” tests. I mean that really shouldn’t count…puts them on par with actual detonations (which Russia is clearly prepping to do soon with tactical nukes).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why shouldn't they count? It's literally testing a nuclear weapon. The clock does not say: "Time since the last detonation of a nuclear weapon".

Edit: But one could argue that nuclear weapons get tested all the time without any kind of detonation. These should count too IMHO.

Edit: just read another article on the tests. They happen to design new weapons with them which makes them not tests to see if the nukes still work like I thought.

[–] macarthur_park 7 points 1 month ago

Why shouldn't they count? It's literally testing a nuclear weapon.

It’s not considered a nuclear weapon test under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, so I think it’s fair to argue the clock shouldn’t be reset for a subcritical test.

[–] TheTetrapod 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're gonna feel reeeaaal silly when they run out of digits in... ~200 years.

[–] Kalladblog 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's an optimistic outlook. Given the drastically shifting political landscape, do you really think the clock will still be standing in 200 years?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

If it is they probably need to reset those numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Looks like this picture was taken in early 2018.