this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
63 points (86.2% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29027 readers
5 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As this #RedditBlackout accelerates the Fediverse experiment, I feel the urge... the need... to chime in with my 2-cents.

My summary of the current lay of the land: Beehaw saw a wave of pornography spam and decided to shut Lemmy.world off and Defederate from this server. I'm too new to this community to fully understand the wants/needs of each individual server, but I've been around the internet long enough to recognize that porn-spam is an age-old trolling technique and will occur again in the future. Especially as small, boutique, hobbyist servers pop up and online drama/rivalries increase, online harassment campaigns (like coordinated porn spam attacks) are simply an inevitability.

Lemmy.world wants open registrations. Beehaw does not: Beehaw wants users to be verified before posting. This is normal: many old /r/subreddits would simply shadowban all 1-year old accounts and earlier... giving the illusion that everything is well for 5+ or 10+ year old accounts, but cut out on the vast majority of spam accounts with short lives. This works for Reddit where you have a huge number of long-lived accounts, but its still not a perfect technique: you can pay poor people in 3rd world countries to create accounts, post on them for a year, and the these now verified accounts can be paid for by spammers to invade various subreddits.

I digress. My main point is that many subreddits, and now Lemmy-instances/communities, want a "trusted user". Akin to the 1+-year-old account on Reddit. Its not a perfect solution by any means, but accounts that have some "weight" to them, that have passed even a crude time-based selection process, are far easier to manage for small moderation teams.

We don't have the benefit of time however, so how do we quickly build trust on the Fediverse? It seems impossible to solve this problem on lemmy.world and Beehaw.org alone. At least, not with our current toolset.

A 3rd Server appears: ImNotAnAsshole.net

But lets add the 3rd server, which I'll hypothetically name "ImNotAnAsshole.net", or INAA.net for short.

INAA.net would be an instance that focuses on building a userbase that follows a large set of different instances recruiting needs. This has the following benefits.

  1. Decentralization -- Beehaw.org is famously only run by 4 administrators on their spare time. They cannot verify hundreds of thousands of new users who appear due to #RedditBlackout. INAA.net would allow another team to focus on the verification problem.

  2. Access to both lemmy.world and Beehaw.org with one login -- As long as INAA.net remains in the good graces of other servers (aka: assuming their user filtering model works), any user who registers on INAA.net will be able to access both lemmy.world and Beehaw.org with one login.

  3. Custom Moderation tools -- INAA.net could add additional features independently of the core github.com/LemmyNet programming team and experiment. It is their own instance afterall.

Because of #2, users would be encouraged to join INAA.net, especially if they want access to Beehaw.org. Lemmy.world can remain how it is, low-moderation / less curated users and communities (which is a more appropriate staging grounds for #RedditBlackout refugees). Beehaw.org works with the INAA.net team on the proper rules for INAA.net to federate with Beehaw.org and everyone's happy.

Or is it? I am new to the Fediverse and have missed out on Mastodon.social drama. Hopefully older members of this community can chime in with where my logic has gone awry.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ulu_mulu 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My much simpler stance is: they don't want lemmy.world users on their instance, I'll respect that, I unsubbed from their communities and found the same elsewhere.

They're not the only Lemmy servers in the world, Lemmy is still new overall, I don't see any problem in "rebuilding" the 2 big subs they have somewhere else, I'm already putting my effort in contributing to make it so.

edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think one thing that hasn't been mentioned here is the huge gap in the size of the communities. The largest beehaw communities have almost 20k subscribers while the largest I've seen from other instances seem to cap out at about 5k. I think the problem is that most of the users who still federate with beehaw will undoubtedly end up there. This presents serious difficulties for growing competing communities.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nivenkos 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

But what is the magical ability to achieve step 2? How do you filter and moderate users reliably at scale?

The fundamental issue is that Beehaw wants to eat their cake and have it too. They want their users to be able to read and comment on other instances, but not have to mirror their content, pay for image hosting, etc. or allow other instances' users access to Beehaw's content.

They want the benefits of federation without giving anything in return.

[–] dragontamer 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I listed Reddit's "secret rule" amongst long-term moderators and subreddit communities. Just straight up ban accounts that are younger than a certain age. That's already going to grossly clamp down on porn-spam and troll accounts, because it means that the trolls need to either buy a pre-made account, or the trolls have to wait a week with good behavior before engaging in troll activity.

EDIT: Is that enough for Beehaw.org? I don't know. But lets say INAA.net is just a time-delay. All accounts less than 1-week are only allowed to post to lemmy.world. All accounts older than that are unlocked to talk with Beehaw.org.

[–] nivenkos 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But in your example, everyone would have to sign up to INAA.net rather than lemmy.world. Like I couldn't use this account, I'd need a separate one because accounts aren't registered across instances like that (nor transferrable atm).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Theoretically, INAA.net could use ActivityPub federation to keep a database of user accounts from various instances based on their Fediverse address (i.e. @[email protected]) that Lemmy and Kbin instances can query to check for things like age and reputation. No accounts would necessarily have to be created there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FantasticFox 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are just describing joining any one of the dozens on instances that aren't defederated from Beehaw or Lemmy.world - your INAA.net already exists in the form of all those instances which Beehaw didn't defederate from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Unlikely to occur. Beehaw's admins hate dissent and anyone questioning them. Well before the blackout, they literally had a "no sources" rule because users kept questioning the mods. Likewise their current "rule set" states what they say, goes, and that everything is up to them, not the rules. They say that with all cases (except obvious trolls), that they will always warn first. I have yet to ever see any kind of warning from any of their admins.

They were being questioned on sh.it and on lemmy.world, so they blocked both. You can check their modlog to see just how little spam they had to deal with.

You can also pop in to look at their discord to see how much they dislike the criticism.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I personally got banned because I got into an argument with the admin there. They wrongly assumed that I was American and made a claim to counter my argument, I then pointed out their mistake that their claim doesn't apply to my country, and then -- Boom, banned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I'm of the opinion that if you want a closed off, strongly moderated, safe space forum you probably shouldn't be federating with anyone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@goat @dragontamer

I read the "essays" the beehive have to "join" and take part. In my view they wanted to make a space for their own community and choose a fediverse where they should have picked a closed off forum/discord/redditcopy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They picked a tool that was fit for purpose. Federation is an option, not a necessity, and not a right.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There’s a bunch of other instances. Like mine at discuss.online. Nothing new is needed.

Seems like you’re just suggesting everyone use beehaw with federated accounts.

[–] dragontamer 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh there's plenty that's needed.

The vast majority of users here are from #RedditBlackout and their eyes glaze over at that discussion point. They don't know what a "federated account" is.

What's needed is education? Community organization? Etc. etc. People are new to Lemmy and Fediverse. People are trying to figure out what the plan is. A lot of users are already feeling "betrayed" that they "chose the wrong server" when they registered here at lemmy.world.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The platform just needs to mature a bit. It’s new and discovered in desperation. It’s free and not monetized. Everyone is working in their free time to build something wonderful.

The Mlem team went from 2 people to 20. They’re about to drop a huge update to their beta app.

The lemmy team worked on front end improvements in the upcoming 0.18 front end.

I have a beta instance setup if anyone wants to see it.

Don’t feel betrayed. Have two accountants. Move to a new instance. Or just wait for them to federate again when the dust settles.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will just block that too. Let them be. They want to play in their own little sandbox.

[–] dragontamer 17 points 1 year ago

Would they? Lemmy.ml is famously more moderated than Lemmy.world. They haven't blocked Lemmy.ml yet.

Beehaw.org is clearly aiming to be on the stricter-side of things. That's... fine. I don't agree with it, but I welcome this era of experimentation. Why? Because I've been part of communities that tore at each other's throats for the dumbest shit you've ever seen online. (XBox vs Playstation). I've been part of online guilds in video games where you'd launch DDOS attacks against other guilds.

This is just... internet troll tactics. What Beehaw has excellently done is step forward and start testing the new anti-troll tools available to them here in lemmy/Fediverse. I hope the best for them. Not because I agree with their leftist slant, but because I've been there. I've been part of communities that were systematically trolled by large, rival groups. Its not fun.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

With Lemmy there's actually a use case for user-only instances, which host no communities. Moderating well is tough and it makes sense to prevent brigading.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

So we got defederated? I guess that explains the massive decline of activity here. It’s really not selling the fediverse for me if you can suddenly be cut off from the rest of the world just like that.

[–] DarraignTheSane 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You've got it the other way around - Beehaw is defederating themselves from all the major instances, because they can't enforce a safe space like they want to at any kind of scale on this Fediverse model. Lemmy.world is about twice the size of Beehaw in number of users.

https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

[–] dragontamer 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That user is from sh.itjust.works, which is a 2nd server that Beehaw also Defederated from.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sh.itjust.works is just as active as ever though, he might be using the wrong filter for his feed. Or he was primarily subscribed to beehaw communities.

[–] DarraignTheSane 3 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Yeah, just saw that. Either way, I completely understand Beehaw's goal but don't understand how they think it's going to work in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In the long run they are hoping for more flexibility. I think it is incorrect that they are separating from “all the major instances” but they are separating from (two) servers with open account creation. I personally think an instance admin should be informed when their users are being banned from other instances, so they have the option to review behavior and consider if they would like to do the same. Sh.itjust.works at least has instance rules that should be compatible with most of what beehaw doesn’t like.

[–] DarraignTheSane 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the long run they are hoping for more flexibility.

And my counter would be that they're not buying themselves flexibility with their proposed approach.

they are separating from (two) servers with open account creation

And I still don't see how anyone thinks that the manual account approval process solves anything. If I'm a bad actor, I can go out right now and create 50 accounts on every Lemmy server, come up with slightly different answers for the stupidly-simple "why do you want to join this instance" question, and have a veritable army of troll accounts approved and at my disposal within the week if I am so determined to be an asshole on Beehaw. In the end, the process is literally no different than an admin-driven manual Captcha that only achieves proving that you're not a robot.

In my mind I view this like an IT security issue. If you are trying to prevent bad actors from entering your environment, you don't just cut your connection to the internet... while leaving wide-open public access terminals in your front lobby for anyone to use as long as they verbally promise not to do bad things.

I don't know what the answer for Beehaw will be, but I know they won't accomplish it with their current plan of action.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Only from beehaw.org, right? I'm still seeing this from sdf.org.

Am I misunderstanding or does this not just mean you'll have to choose your registered instance to match your needs, and if some instances you like are too widely considered problematic to access from a broadly useful instance you may have to have another identity there.

Somewhere like beehaw.org appears to be an instance that's likely to exclude fairly aggressively, so that's a consideration for whether you want that to be your home.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see how one out of 160+ servers not connecting to sh.itjust.works would cut you out from the rest of the world.

I think of it more like being cut off from 1/160th of the fediverse. Unfortunate, but in the end a type of community I don't think I'll miss since our values don't align.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Beehaw is in the top 3 Lemmy instances, so I wouldn't say it's 1/160th. Probably more like 1/5th. Or maybe even 1/4th because of how much better established the server was before the reddit exodus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I know what you mean, and from that point of view I agree. I have different values and so I use different measurements; A connection to a small instance is equally valuable as a connection to a big instance. It's not about the amount of content but building a new paradigm of social media.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

can't users from any other instance already do this?

beehaw blocks world so they can't see each other but users from other instances can still see both. I'm currently on lemmy.one and I'm subbed to comms at both beehaw and LWorld.

they only problem i see is for users in those specific instances as they can't see one another, but everyone else can see both.

i think the result here is that beehaw will be limiting itself. probably fine as they are overwhelmed right now anyway. it seems that's what they wanted to do from the start as well. if they begin blocking even more instances things will get smaller for them.

but hey, that's the beauty of the fediverse. if you want an instance that does exactly what you want then go for it. make your own. link to whoever you want and block whoever you want

speaking of that, are users getting more ways to block instances and communities? I'd like to have all the tools to customize my feed. there's no AI doing it for me (which is good) so i need the ability to do it myself

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your hypothetical 3rd server already exists as basically any other federated instance. I don't like the idea of having a central authority that controls user accounts though.

Maybe an alternative would be some sort of circle of trust type system that doesn't rely on a central authority?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're basically describing how the fediverse works I think.

How is it different than the current situation where both lemmy.world and beehaw.org are connect to lemmy.ml?

[–] dragontamer 17 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Given my perspective as part of the #RedditBlackout wave, I think its needed for me to explicitly point out this perspective this week. I recognize that you folk who have been hanging around the Fediverse longer than me already recognize this as reality. But this is a new world for a lot of the folk joining up Lemmy.world.

The issue, is that we were sold on "It doesn't matter which server you sign up for" on https://github.com/maltfield/awesome-lemmy-instances. See this quote:

Don't overthink this. It doesn't matter which instance you use. You'll still be able to interact with communities (subreddits) on all other instances, regardless of which instance your account lives 🙂

This oversold the community, got a bunch of former Redditors signed up here, and now a bunch of people are feeling kinda-sorta betrayed by the values already.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] drphungky 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I actually thought about starting my own server with very strict user verification, but I don't really have hosting capacity other than a personal server with like... One 9 of uptime. Nor do I care to change that.

But I think there would be serious draw with a user base that was guaranteed to be a real person, like through phone or face picture verification. Not everyone would go for it because not everyone wants to trust a random with that kind of information, but it worked on some subreddits like /r/fatfire for guaranteed proof of wealth. Think of it like having a public Facebook or Twitter account. Nothing stops you from having a bunch of anonymous alts, but certain servers might only want people from that vetted list. I'd certainly do it. If someone else wants to physically host the server, I'd be happy to vet people. But who would trust me?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'd say that phone/face verification is an overkill. Moreover, as you have already mentioned not everyone would go for it. Especially the kind of people who like Fediverse and open-source software in general will be more wary of such practices in general, I suppose. I'm not a fan of such practices myself because I care about privacy and the proposed tactic really reminds me of mainstream social media.

I think that so far the verification system works just alright. Being verified by a small text while signing up works. Using the same pseudonym and contributing to the community with quality content and decent comment history to build yourself a positive reputation also does.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

It’s a great idea, but how do you propose verification on the INAA.net site? Using their current instance account details and seeing how many upvotes their comments and posts have received or something? Essentially developing a Karma tracking system that’s seperate to Lemmy.

Like you say a staging post, but then account elevation which allows it on more sensitive instances? I don’t know how we could guide new users to these staging instances though, unless every popular instance, where most content is created, draws up the bridges together and makes them read-only to the staging instances.

If beehaw didn’t want to get involved, it’s up to them, but I can see other instances who would want to use the service. Tbh the beehaw admins do sound like they a tad powermad so screw them anyway.

Lemmy needs a governing body, based on a democratic election system, to handle all this in all in sync between all instance admins. That body would also be in control of the master blocklists.

[–] dragontamer 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know how we could guide new users to these staging instances though

Read-only access to Beehaw.org, but with a message "Beehaw.org has a user-treaty with INAA.net. Only users older than 1-week can post to Beehaw.org instances"

I admit that these features don't exist yet. But why not? Lets first come up with the idea and try to figure out what is easiest to code.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›