this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
103 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

7771 readers
619 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://t.me/strikedronescompany/240

They say that it is very difficult to burn the analogue T-90.

Our unit already has 6 T-90 "Breakthrough"

All 6 stopped while moving, 2 of them with instant detonation, 2 burned during repeated damage and 2 failed to ignite.

In this case, our kamikaze drone hit the engine compartment - stopping the tank. Someone from the adjacent units damaged the upper part of the tower - damaging the guidance optics.

Then several friendly units tried to ignite the tank, but failed. We got tired of watching this and one of our pilots decided to show a master class by hitting clearly between the turret and the hull.

Enjoy watching friends. Thanks for support!

Every day, new videos on the channel of the 47th OMBr attack UAV company ⬇️⬇️⬇️

https://t.me/strikedronescompany

Subscription is mandatory 🔝🔝🔝

We publish only our work. Without politics, news and other unnecessary things.

Let's destroy 💥 Russian 🐽 together 🚁 🛩

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All that armour, seemingly for no reason.

[–] Warl0k3 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unironically should have had a cope cage. They're so ubiquitous at this point that it's kinda mindboggling to see a modern MBT driving around without one. Like guys come on, it won't save you but it will at least make top kill from a slowmoving drone slightly more sporting...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seemed the entire manned tank thing is past it TBH.

I can envisage other ideas I won’t go into here. But that form has reached its evolutionary dead end.

[–] Warl0k3 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's still a need for armored support, a self propelled pillbox and an all terrain armored supercomputer with a big gun and extreme network connectivity, but the war of russian aggression sure is driving home how much modern MBT do not mesure up to whats needed in those roles.

Hell even the most current NATO tanks are just getting devoured in this shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where does the ‘super computer’ come into it?

[–] Warl0k3 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fire control systems are already pretty impressive. Not so much what currently gets run in ex: an abrams, but field C&C systems have gotten insanely powerful. Admittedly most of that power comes from being an ASIC, so youre not going to do much besides coordinate telemetry and push firing solutions (and play doom), but still there is an absolute fuckload of data getting dredged through those systems and every flop counts.

As the networked battlefield continues to be the ringer everyone knew it would be, the demand for frontline computational power is just going to increase. Especially with jamming tech becoming so critical to both sides in this conflict, the idea of a local controller gets more and more attractive. Tanks already have absurdly excessive power plants, decent sneakiness (relatively dont @ me, it's not a Bradley is all I mean) and can fight their way out of trouble on their own. They make a pretty attractive platform to base a heavy drone mothership off of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

TBH I only understand about half of what you are saying.

[–] eran_morad 10 points 2 months ago

Beautiful. Let’s kill the blyats.

[–] Diplomjodler3 9 points 2 months ago

No turret toss? Meh. 7/10.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Man, those guys are good. Looks like they line up a perfect shot to hit where the turret joins the hull.

[–] Thcdenton 2 points 2 months ago

Is that pork chops I smell?