Linkedin : memes

[–] [email protected] 95 points 6 months ago (2 children)

AI = 0 □

[+] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn't give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

Instead you'd get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

And that's not even the correct formula. It's

E^2 = (mc^(2))^2 + (pc)^2

You can't just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

The way to remember this is that it's equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end

[+] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like some ~~bullshit artist~~ motivational speaker

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Probably an AI expert too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And a Bitcoin Scholar

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire "crypto" shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] NorthWestWind 46 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It also means AI = 0

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^

If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^

I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well math might be, physics for sure isn't

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I'd bet money that was written by an LLM.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

😆

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Deleted

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

[email protected] back at it again with some more AI bs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I love that's it's not "what are you on about?" it's just a general what

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It goes on like this:

What

The

Actual

F***

Is

This?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I want to know who this idiot is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

his name is Chatgpt

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 8 points 6 months ago

I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I choose to believe he's just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Worse, iceberg lettuce. If the first one is also iceberg, pass.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

This reads like a post written by AI as well lol

[–] DaddleDew 11 points 6 months ago

When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

they did the meth right

[–] ikidd 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ha! "Consultant / Technology Manager" -- pretty sure he's just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.

Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] berkeleyblue 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He should have let an AI proofread this…

[–] AdrianTheFrog 11 points 6 months ago

It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I like how the OP's name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Both terms are linked by a blockchain.

Memes

Rules: