this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
490 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
3276 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

RAWR -Your favorite Dino bros maybe.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you my Spinosaurus angel

[–] 123nope567 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a huge AI fan but I think using it to visualize the bizarre shit that people would draw if they could is a good application. Just don't use it to put people out of work without compensation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why shouldn't artists have to find other work if their primary work is unnecessary? Not saying AI is good enough to replace them yet, but when it is, why shouldn't it? Free people's time for more worthwhile endeavours, no point being payed to do something that can be automated - besides for niche circumstances, such as artisans. But most artists today are employed doing soul-breaking tasks like graphic design for ads, and if AI can free people from that, I'd be all for it. Why wouldn't you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you, 100%. I absolutely would, just not without compensation. I'm a big ol' dirty lefty. I believe if we lose jobs to increased efficiency or automation, all society should benefit, not just the rich, and those who have lost those jobs shouldn't just be kicked to the curb as they so commonly are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't disagree there! I do wonder how you think such a society might arise though. How do we get from how we are now to a fair society where everyone benefits equally from advances in automation?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Standard lefty fare: get rid of the surprisingly small group of people who ensure we don't benefit equally so they can skim increasingly large amounts off the top of our very existence while providing little benefit themselves. What that looks like is pretty contextual. I'd prefer a non-violent, gradual transition of power, but telling a bunch of entitled sociopaths they don't get to leech off the world because they popped out of the right crotch historically hasn't been an easy or friendly process. They get real pissy.

Incrementally, people can band together and just oust their economic and cultural oppressors. A fun, somewhat related example is ROC USA, a non-profit that helps residents of manufactured home parks collectively purchase the land they previously rented. More generically, workers cooperatives are democratically controlled, worker owned businesses, so anything that benefits the cooperative benefits the workers. If someone's job is made irrelevant, they're moved to another position and the increased efficiency/income benefits all workers, not a parasite class that is paid simply for buying an imaginary portion of the company. Workers co-ops are more common in Europe.

So basically, we change how we do everything and either wrest power from the hands of the few or start doing our own thing that economically stonewalls them. I've always wanted to start a non-profit grocery store!

[–] ooterness 4 points 6 months ago

There's a song about this. (Different ancient creature, but the principle is the same.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Are we actually related? Besides using DNA

[–] Donkter 1 points 6 months ago

We have a lot of conceptions of dinosaurs having hilariously tiny hands relative to their body. Wouldn't it make more sense if they had huge fleshy/cartilage appendages and their arms were vestigial?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

those spines are 100% the anchor point of something that decomposed away before it fossilized.