this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
78 points (92.4% liked)

Anticonsumption

317 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
78
Removed (reddthat.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

First of all, why is the y axis on the right? Second of all, this is made look much bigger than it is as the y axis doesn't start at 0.

[–] 1111 31 points 6 months ago

This y axis placement is quite common for stock tickers. I suppose it is intended to make it easiest to see the most up to date price, which is the pertinent information for most readers. Similarly, the y axis starting at zero is conventional wisdom for scientific data, but I suppose the most relevant visual for stocks is the price fluctuation, which is best viewed with y autoscaling over the selected timeframe.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Is this in response to union efforts?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

It's because they announced to shareholders they made $500 million less than expected in the last 3 months. They expected to make $9.1 billion but made $8.6 billion. Their sales are down worldwide indicating it's not just a US thing.

[–] madeinthebackseat 7 points 6 months ago

Or the opposite. I now actively avoid Starbucks due to their behavior towards unions. When I do go, I always ask the employees if they have unionized yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Possibly. Starbucks, Workers United made ‘significant progress’ in last week’s contract talks.

I wouldn't put it past them to under-report their earnings to get more leverage in unionization negotiations, engineering a temporary drop in share price.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Is that your kink?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

That's impressive