this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
156 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

60100 readers
2926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bungie wins $489K from player for racist harassment of employee | Ruling sets legal precedent for companies to recover costs from harassment campaigns.::Ruling sets legal precedent for companies to recover costs from harassment campaigns.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think those funds should be given to the employee harmed by the harassment. But somehow I think they'll just fill Bungie's coffers.

[–] lechatron 28 points 1 year ago

The majority of the settlement is reimbursement.

Comer's harassment campaign cost Bungie over $380,000 in the form of investigation costs, "executive protection" for the affected community manager, and lost work when the employee "needed to take time off and curtail his public interactions with Destiny 2 fans."

as well as over $80,000 in legal fees and $25,000 in statutory damages

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Crazy story. Sounds like that wasn't a punitive amount, that's how much the cost Bungie. They hired executive protection services for the employee, investigators, lawyers (obviously)...

[–] Debrox 11 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article? Bungie claim 380K USD as investigation expenses, amd only 25K in statutory damages and then 80K or so in legal fees.

If they led an investigation themselves then this already is doing a lot in favor of the employee. And possibly means police did not do their job.

Hopefully this piece of shit won't retaliate.

[–] Sanctus 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not sure how I feel about this. Employees should not be harassed. But setting precedents for corporations to sue individuals based on their interactions with employees is a dangerous dance. I just told a mod in another sub they handled a user posting in the wrong space poorly. What if that could be seen as harassment? Altogether though definitely don't be a racist shitbag.

[–] Dark_Arc 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's fine. Calling this an "interaction" is a pretty significant understatement.

You're going to get sued over a handful of text or not liking somebody. If you decide to run a campaign to harass an employee into quitting/suicide/etc, and throw in death threats, along with packages delivered to their residence... You should 100% get what's coming to you.

[–] ilikekeyboards 6 points 1 year ago

That should be part of criminal justice not a justice case. If the company I work would get half a mil for the pain I get put through they would drag me through even more shit. Without an extra penny.

I'll just retort to mercenary work

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The legal definition of harassment hasn’t changed. You’ll be fine.

[–] Sanctus -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legal definitions can and will change if this precedent is set.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The guy tracked down the guys home address and sent threatening messages. If you think that shouldn't be prosecuted then you'd be a hypocrite unless you also wanted real life harassment laws too be repealed as well. Just because harassment is done at a distance does not make it ok. Harassment laws aren't taken lightly in person, you have to do seriously over the top and intrusive actions, so there's zero reason to think that the same precedent wouldn't apply to online harassment.

[–] Sanctus 1 points 1 year ago

Obviously thats not okay. But once we accept large conglomerates sueing people they'll start toeing the boundaries. Nintendo already enslaved a guy for the rest of his life. This particular case is deserving, some won't be.

[–] jrs100000 9 points 1 year ago

The key difference is that what you did, at least as you described it, was actually not harassment.

[–] McLoud 1 points 1 year ago

What was on the "inedible" pizza I would like to know.