this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023

290 points (98.7% liked)

Firefox

4323 readers

1 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lightbeam24

290

Firefox now has speed parity with Chrome on the Speedometer benchmark (mozilla.social)

submitted 2 years ago by Neikon to c/firefox

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/1376783

Thought I'd never see the day when Firefox would match Chrome on Speedometer.

There's also a few other benchmarks got a sizable boost. https://arewefastyet.com/

top 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

That inverted Y axis without defining score is terrible. Just terrible.

For those wondering Chrome is faster according to this guy. Firefox has gotten faster meaning it caught up to Chrome in a GOOD way, vs bad.

Meanwhile I constantly feel like webpages across the board just load like ass these days. Should be no reason Ublock Origin with a fast ass CPU, 32g of Ram and a good internet connection doesn't just instant load websites. Nope, gotta wait for Ublock to kill off a bunch of stuff, cookie banners to pop up... Ask me to login... I'm getting old lol.

[–] sethboy66 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not even that Ublock/bloat is slowing things down, web sites are plagued by bad development and multi-standard requirements leading to tons of wasted processing time waiting for elements which eventually error out. I've analyzed performance on multiple websites, even big-name and high-traffic websites like Youtube and found that 60%+ of load time is just sitting there doing barely any processing while waiting for extra remote services to be contacted only to never load and finally fail allowing to page to go interactable. It's like having a beast of a computer but forgoing actual RAM in place for pagefile-as-ram; all other components could be amazing, but you're paying that performance tax no matter what.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why can't we go back to php and HTML? Why can't we go back to web1? Why can't we go back to the days when the internet was an Eldridge city waiting to be explored!? ITS BECUASE OF THE FUCKING CORPATIZATION SOUL SUCKING MODEL OF THE INTERNET WE HAVE NOW!!! They wouldn't let us go back even if we stopped using the internet all together becuase there will still be those users that are dumb enough to saty on and swallow ads! Do you know how much time I waste on stupid sites like youtube!? HOURS! its by design to, keep you addicted, unaware and numb, and you wont have enough energy to fight back! IM FED UP WITH WEB2! I'm taking my cat silanced ar and heading to silicon valley! WHOS WITH ME!? ITS TIME FOR CHANGE!?

[–] baked_tea 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If you're looking to get hacked on day one.. go ahead lmao

I'd suggest a good browser but I'd get banned here most likely

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Ik, you're right. I'm just so fucking angry.

[–] nxfsi 5 points 2 years ago

uBO hard mode + whitelist + LocalCDN. Everything loads as fast as network allows.

[–] Speculater 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, did you say you wanted to enable notifications?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hissssssss

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Turn off java. 🤷🏿‍♂️

[–] DreadTowel 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Interesting. Why is chrome faster than chromium? I thought chrome was chromium with bells and whistles.

[–] michaelfone 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Predictive preloading has an effect, I’d guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Of the nefarious user-aware kind?

[–] Hazdaz 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now do something about its endless thirst for RAM.

[–] Speculater 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why the fuck is Chrome holding 8 GB hostage when it's minimized??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I've only got 8GB. Good thing I don't use Chrome!

[–] shotgun_crab 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah that ain't happening

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can’t wait to fully switch to Firefox as soon as HDR is fully implemented!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Huh?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I recently bought two HDR monitors and noticed there is no HDR support on things like youtube videos. Chromium based browsers support it though so for the time being I’m using Opera GX.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Waterfox has had it since 2022, btw.
https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/releases/tag/G5.0

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

So I checked it out and it appears it only has support for it on Mac. Time to continue waiting patiently!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Awesome thanks for the heads up!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Last browser standing that will support adblockers in the future.

[–] UnixPornViewer 4 points 2 years ago

Firefox FTW.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

...Why dafuq is the score inversed?

[–] MeanEYE 3 points 2 years ago

I see they didn't measure startup speed.

load more comments