tell me your arguments
libertarianism
About us
An open, user owned community for the general disscussion of the libertarian philosophy.
- Libertarianism is the belief that each person has the right to live his life as he chooses so long as he respects the equal rights of others.
- Libertarians defend each person’s right to life, liberty, and property.
- In the libertarian view, voluntary agreement is the gold standard of human relationships.
- If there is no good reason to forbid something (a good reason being that it violates the rights of others), it should be allowed.
- Force should be reserved for prohibiting or punishing those who themselves use force.
Most people live their own lives by that code of ethics. Libertarians believe that that code should be applied consistently, even to the actions of governments, which should be restricted to protecting people from violations of their rights. Governments should not use their powers to censor speech, conscript the young, prohibit voluntary exchanges, steal or “redistribute” property, or interfere in the lives of individuals who are otherwise minding their own business.
Source: https://www.libertarianism.org/essays/what-is-libertarianism
Rules
1. Stay on topic
We are a libertarian community. There are no restrictions regarding different stances on the political spectrum, but all posts should be related to the philosophy of libertarianism.
2. Be polite to others and respects each others opinions.
Be polite to others and respects each others opinions. We don't want any form of gatekeeping or circlejerk culture here.
3. Stay constructive and informational
In general, all types of contributions are allowed, but the relevance to this community must always be evident and presented openly by the contributor. Posts that do not meet these requirements will be removed after a public warning. Also remember to cite you sources!
4. Use self-moderation measures first before reporting.
This community is fundamentally built upon freedom of speech. Since everyone understands libertarianism differently and we do not want to exclude any kind of content a priori, we appeal to the individual users to block/mute posts or users who do not meet their requirements. Please bear this in mind when filing a report
I agreed to the NAP when I clicked on the little party thing.
Or perhaps this is an attempt to use Cunningham's Law to summon others from far and wide.
Where do you stand on ranked-choice voting?
I'm a little suspicious of it to be honest. I can see the potential upside but, what could go wrong? How can it be abused or gamed? Will it actually change anything? My perspective is coming from a state pretty strongly dominated by one party and that often shapes my concerns.
I think it would change things. I think it would make it a lot easier to justify voting for third-party candidates, since it wouldn’t split the vote between GOP and Dem candidates. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think there are a lot of folks who really want to vote for a third-party candidate but are afraid to do so because they’re afraid of splitting the vote and causing the bad guys (from their perspective) to win.
No true libertarian would say that!