this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
27 points (88.6% liked)

World News

33422 readers
918 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Artificial views. It's the same way cable tv gets their views by having it run in bars, restaurants, airports, etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Artificial ad impressions is more like it.

Doesn’t matter if nobody’s watching, the digital ad buyers have no way of knowing.

[–] kn33 9 points 2 years ago

That's a crossover I didn't see coming

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I can’t believe Redbox still even exists at this point… let alone >3000 of the things.

[–] TheCelticPirate 6 points 2 years ago

They do well in rural areas that have little to no internet options.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s the only place left to get a physical BluRay and they’re only for $2 instead of a stream for $5+.

[–] SheeEttin 1 points 2 years ago

I was going to make some comment about how long it would be to come out ahead since I would also have to buy a Blu-ray player, but turns out the cheapest ones are like $35, and probably even less used. So it would be like 12 movies for it to make sense.

I'd still rather just hit a button on my phone and have it play than have a separate player and have to go get discs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Eh, I like it sometimes. Renting a movie digitally costs $5+, renting that same movie from Redbox costs ~$2 and I don't need to give up my info to some online service. it's a little annoying going there physically, but I also have the option of ripping it from the DVD and watching it later (legality may vary, YMMV).

So online rentals are more expensive and less privacy-friendly. That's enough for me to favor Redbox.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago