this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
96 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
3459 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] visualfeast 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who else is wondering if we will even still be around in 70 years?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

raises hand

[–] Kbobabob -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How is this technology related? I'm struggling to find the connection.

[–] arditty 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear tech is still tech, even if it’s not something that we’ll personally encounter.

[–] Kbobabob 0 points 1 year ago

Did they actually talk the tech though?

[–] jaackf 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine because there's some amount of technology involved in nuclear power

[–] Kbobabob 0 points 1 year ago

Then they should talk about that tech.

[–] astropenguin5 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same way all the posts about solar and wind are. It's about bringing a technology back to the US too

[–] Kbobabob 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Shouldn't the article at least talk about the tech then?

[–] astropenguin5 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does tho? The whole point is that new reactors need this special HALEU fuel but the only current supplier in the world is from a Russian company, but there's one starting up in the US now, helped by the government, to provide fuel for a bunch of new nuclear startups that almost all require the special fuel. It even explains what is special about the fuel and how it's made, and a little about why it's needed. Not very in depth, but still. It's more about the logistics and economics of bringing this nuclear tech back to the US than the actual tech itself, which is still valuable in a tech discussion forum.

[–] Kbobabob -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand what you're saying. I was hoping this community was mostly about tech and not the geopolitical aspect of what drives tech.

[–] astropenguin5 1 points 1 year ago

I believe it still mostly is, but a key part of most is that it is not all, so its ok to have a few posts here and there about the economics and/or geopolitics. Tbh one of the more interesting parts to me was the struggle of getting production started because fuel production has to start a few years before reactor start, so there is a large supply/demand hurdle to get over, and it's interesting the difference in how it was done the first time when nuclear energy was just starting out as opposed to now.