this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

한국 Lemmy 커뮤니티 / Korea Lemmy community

155 readers
2 users here now

한국에 관심 있는 모두를 위한 공간 / Space for those who are interested in everything Korean

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I can only imagine it helps, if it has sleeping wagons - designated for boosting birth rate - connected to it.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ah yes the biggest concern i have when family planning is on public transit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

- 1 hour travel time = + 1 hour sex = more babies. The math doesn't lie! ^/s^

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What the hell are you gonna do with the other 57 minutes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Sob silently in the bathroom?

[–] Badeendje 10 points 3 months ago

Anything but making sure you have a healthy work life balance, enough free time and money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I think they are suffering from a mistranslation of the English phrase: “running a train while on speed”.

[–] Etterra 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How often do I have to explain it. To encourage breeding you need extensive financial incentives. for everything from medical bills to cost of living to education. Do government idiots even know how much kids cost in developed nations?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Sorry. The best we can offer as your government is no pre-natal care, no paternity leave, stagnate wages, and lack of accessibility of childcare. We need to make sure that our corporate supporters continue to fatten their bottom line, executive bonuses get larger, and shareholders get even more value.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

5 years of maternity leave too. Figure out how to pay for it because you can't afford not to and reproductive labor isn't something you can just ignore

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

i think the logics off but i cant say im not a jealous american

[–] foyrkopp 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I actually don't think their logic is that implausible.

Obviously, it's not about giving people more time for baby making.

But (just as an arbitrary example) if you're spending two hours per day driving to and from work, slashing that down to a single hour can massively reduce a family's overall stress level.

And "Less stressed people have more room in their lives for bigger families" is an equation that doesn't sound that dumb.

Obviously, there might be better ways to go about this. Or there actually might not.

There's definitely more impactful ways to improve people's work-life balance, but most of those aren't as easily implemented.

In an ideal world, they might have done extensive studies into why people don't have more babies, and then selected an efficient parameter to tune.

(As a rule, investing into public transportation will usually pay socio-economic dividends either way, as long as it's done at least halfway decently.)

In a less ideal world, massive lobbying by the very people profiting off this investment first might have been involved.

Overall, this whole affair has decent odds of becoming some sort of net benefit overall.

[–] Holyginz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It has the potential to create a net benefit, but very much doubt it will work the way they think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

South Korean Employers:

"It's free real estate."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

lmao how is this related...??