this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
한국 Lemmy 커뮤니티 / Korea Lemmy community
160 readers
4 users here now
한국에 관심 있는 모두를 위한 공간 / Space for those who are interested in everything Korean
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I actually don't think their logic is that implausible.
Obviously, it's not about giving people more time for baby making.
But (just as an arbitrary example) if you're spending two hours per day driving to and from work, slashing that down to a single hour can massively reduce a family's overall stress level.
And "Less stressed people have more room in their lives for bigger families" is an equation that doesn't sound that dumb.
Obviously, there might be better ways to go about this. Or there actually might not.
There's definitely more impactful ways to improve people's work-life balance, but most of those aren't as easily implemented.
In an ideal world, they might have done extensive studies into why people don't have more babies, and then selected an efficient parameter to tune.
(As a rule, investing into public transportation will usually pay socio-economic dividends either way, as long as it's done at least halfway decently.)
In a less ideal world, massive lobbying by the very people profiting off this investment first might have been involved.
Overall, this whole affair has decent odds of becoming some sort of net benefit overall.
It has the potential to create a net benefit, but very much doubt it will work the way they think.
South Korean Employers:
"It's free real estate."