I mean, won't that kind of be up to the new HC? Seems like they'd really be hampering themselves if theyre trying to hire a new HC but saying he has to keep the staff that went 1-11.
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
College Football
823 readers
20 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
| /c/CFB Poll Top 25 |  |
|---|---|
| 1. Texas |  |
| 2. Alabama |  |
| 3. Tennessee |  |
| T-4. Oregon |  |
| T-4. Penn State |  |
| 6. Ohio State |  |
| 7. Miami |  |
| 8. Missouri |  |
| 9. Iowa State |  |
| 10. Michigan |  |
| T-11. BYU |  |
| T-11. Indiana |  |
| T-11. ~~UNLV~~ |  |
| T-14. LSU |  |
| T-14. Notre Dame |  |
| 16. USC |  |
| 17. Clemson |  |
| 18. Georgia |  |
| 19. Ole Miss |  |
| 20. Oklahoma |  |
| 21. Illinois |  |
| 22. James Madison |  |
| 23. Kentucky |  |
| T-24. Duke |  |
| T-24. Pitt |  |
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Maybe it’s just to try and keep recruits from decommitting or entering the portal? It seems unlikely to not have some assistant coaching changes when a new coach comes in, especially given the circumstances.