I mean, won't that kind of be up to the new HC? Seems like they'd really be hampering themselves if theyre trying to hire a new HC but saying he has to keep the staff that went 1-11.
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
College Football
845 readers
19 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
| /c/CFB Poll Top 25 |  |
|---|---|
| 1. Oregon |  |
| 2. Ohio State |  |
| 3. Texas |  |
| 4. Notre Dame |  |
| 5. Penn State |  |
| 6. Georgia |  |
| 7. Indiana |  |
| 8. Alabama |  |
| T-9. Ole Miss |  |
| T-9. South Carolina |  |
| 11. SMU |  |
| 12. Tennessee |  |
| 13. Army |  |
| T-14. Miami |  |
| T-14. Boise State |  |
| 16. Texas A&M |  |
| 17. Clemson |  |
| 18. Tulane |  |
| 19. Colorado |  |
| 20. BYU |  |
| 21. Iowa State |  |
| T-22. Kansas State |  |
| T-22. Arizona State |  |
| 24. Missouri |  |
| 25. USC |  |
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Maybe it’s just to try and keep recruits from decommitting or entering the portal? It seems unlikely to not have some assistant coaching changes when a new coach comes in, especially given the circumstances.