Samsung would give far better shots idiots smh.
/s (incase someone can't tell)
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
Samsung would give far better shots idiots smh.
/s (incase someone can't tell)
I mean, probably? A new Samsung doesn't have a big telephoto lens, but the coatings on the optics is mine don't seem to be in good shape. Also, I have to manually focus and I'm only able to get it good enough through the viewfinder. Furthermore, the sensor in my Nikon probably just isn't as good.
They're joking as newer Samsung phones "use AI to upscale Moon photos" when in reality, they're essentially faking Moon photos by replacing what people take with higher resolution ones they have.
I was making fun of samsung moon pic scandal hence the /s. Your work is really good.
I had to look it up and I completely missed that controversy. I realize I'm late to the game, but that's absolutely insane that a camera app would essentially replace what it thinks is a bad photo by the user with an AI generated photo of what it thinks the user actually intended to produce. Such a process is dishonest, arguably unethical, and stupid! If the app thinks the user took a bad photo of the moon, it should just say so with a prompt including a link to a good, public domain photo.
And thank you! As far as I know, I did not have any help/interference by AI lol!
Looks like you got it. Good job!
Thanks!
Very nice, any stacking or is it a single untracked shot?
No stacking or tracking, but I did use a tripod. These were the settings: 1/320 shutter, medium aperture on the adapter, ISO 400. Is used auto adjust in post mainly to help with brightness. The unedited shot was kind of dim, but there was less detail with a wider aperture or slower shutter speed.
Very nice!
Good Lord... I just woke up and thought this meant someone shot the moon and freaked out for a second.