this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
62 points (86.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

10571 readers
122 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An in-depth look at the star crossed lovers we didn't get to see in DS9 including interviews with the cast and crew about why it didn't happen. Includes some details about the origin of slash fic

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mawkishdave 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do remember reading that they did want to have those two characters being gay but the studio really pushed back on that. This is why it took so long for ST to have characters that are LGBT.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah. There are a lot of interviews of them saying they were both interested but was stymied by the system

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NewEnglandRedshirt 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didn't Alexander Siddig and Andrew Robinson do a screen-read during quarantine of their respective characters as an old, married couple? Or was that something I just imagined? Obviously, not canon, but it's something that the fan base has certainly gotten behind!

[–] confluency 11 points 1 year ago

I've found the playlist -- it's called Alone Together. I've just started on the first episode and it's pretty cool. It's a fanfiction radio play!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They did and it was glorious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's a small clip from them doing it in the video. It's pretty glorious

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting background knowledge that they were supposed to be gay, puts a lot of things into new perspective.

That being said, I don’t really like the idea, I enjoyed them as these unlikely but good platonic friends. I don’t think adding a romantic aspect to them would have improved their characters. For example Garak has many traits that could be interpreted as stereotypically gay, especially within the time period the show was produced. Him being a flamboyant and well spoken heterosexual works better to subvert cliches. Come to think of it, Bashir also isn’t the manliest of men. Which i also find more interesting for a heterosexual character.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So much for fully automated luxury gay space communism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›