this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
260 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16762 readers
1443 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] thirteene 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The game is a heart breaking disappointment and a flagship example of enshitification. But the product managers delivered an amazing hack job. They retooled an existing engine, ~~reskinned it~~ tweaked some colors, and added item rolls and launched very quickly after the immortal failure.

The game delivered because the base design was functional, most of the failures came from the new loot system storing cache between players, not being able to scale mob size, lack of qa, lack of added art. All of which can be explained by the rushed time line. But the game sold ungodly amount of copies, just because of the name. Minimal investment and massive payout means it was a business success, although the players are still pissed that the original game designer had no idea what was fun. After the bad press activation did they try clean house but the damage was done.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 13 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Gonna need sources. I'm not a D4 apologist. It bored the hell out of me. I got about 50+ hours in and I stopped because I kept falling asleep near the end.

But to say it lacked qa and art, and was rushed?

It's an artistically gorgeous game. The details are amazing. It has a high level of polish. Not a single bug.

[–] Evotech 2 points 8 months ago

Doesn't matter you bought it

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You played 50+hours? If it was boring why did you give it that many hours?

I couldnt do that.

I didnt even give it the time of day to purchase it. After diablo immortal and the rest of what had been going on with blizzard around that time i knew the diablo 4 was going to be a cash grab and a waste of time.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It was actually really enjoyable the first 10 hours. Im 40 and love games like this where you can turn off your brain, like Destiny. The demo gave me a nostalgia kick and I felt like a kid again playing Diablo 2 on my old WinXp computer. Unfortunately, there's just no real energy to the game. From level 20 to max level, nothing feels different. My damage became higher, and were just a bit flasher, but i didn't feel that satisfaction of player progression in the game beyond checking tasks like in a crappy Ubisoft game.

I honestly don't think Diablo 4 is a cash grab. The level of details and polish in the game is pretty high. They changed the art style from D3 (which was like a WoW ripoff) and took inspiration from Dark Souls. If it didn't have the online only BS, I strongly feel like modding could fix it a lot.

I'm actually hoping the expansion makes it better. Diablo 3 sucked. But it sas "fixed" with the expansion after two years. (But it still doesn't meet D2's quality)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Product managers retooled an existing engine and reskinned it and..."

Jesus fuckin christ dude, stop making things up. As an actual developer, I can with confidence say what you just wrote is complete and absolute bullshit and you either made it up or are parroting something someone else said.

[–] alilbee 2 points 7 months ago

It's really disheartening to see the same uninformed, cynical outrage culture come over from the games communities on Reddit, especially when I know Lemmy is full of tech-y people who know the realities of these things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The game lacked everything. I got it for free using points and was immediately bored and disgusted with its mtx. The story was not good, graphics were eh, and the gameplay was nothing new.

I'm really disappointed with blizzard lately.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

If only financially, yes. It's literally Blizzard's fastest selling game ever.

The game itself is hot garbage to anyone who's played any other arpg.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

They probably made the money back, and then some

[–] [email protected] 63 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

Financial success.

[–] RizzRustbolt 6 points 8 months ago
[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Success

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] LordCrom 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Diablo 4 sucked. It really did. I wanted my money back. Diablo 3 I replayed for years, lots of fun. But 4 just seemed like a grind with no real after win bonus play at all. It was a slosh to get through even once. And once done I didn't want to try it again from scratch with a new character.

Path of exile I liked. This I can get behind

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Back in my day, we all said Diablo 3 sucked, and Diablo 2 was where it's at.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

D2R was absolutely perfect. Loved it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

..do you hit tab after every sentence?

[–] LordCrom 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Period with 2 spaces. As it should be

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you not see how weird it looks? We don't use typewriters anymore you're being silly

[–] LordCrom 1 points 7 months ago

I think it makes it more readable. My 2 cents

[–] lorkano 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For people here, give last epoch a try. Studio is fair, game is better than diablo 4 and more modern than POE. Really fun to play

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It got a 6.1 metacritic user review, more negative than neutral, but its steam score is very positive with 70:20 split. Looks like most of the negative reviews were around launch time? It is a Tencent game, which is problematic, but it was also very controversial for bugs including duping items, and actually it looks like they're still in the middle of those controversies as discussions about the state of the game are actively being removed from various websites...

Pass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There were a lot of server problems at launch, but apart from that the game is REALLY good, even for people like me who spent 600hours on PoE. I bought Last Epoch during Early Access and they have done so much good work, it's very impressive. The devs are very reactive to feedback, and when streamers said the game was bad in very early access, they listened to the complaints and made it better. Zizaran said they had the best reaction towards negative feedback.
I havent heard about the duping items things, and it is less owned by tencent than PoE is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I liked last epoch. Got about 40 hours in with two playthroughs. Necromancer is just a blender of death, and old wizard man drops meteors on everything.

The end game is a little tepid and there's no ng+, so I'm done with it for now, but I feel like I got my money's worth.

[–] lorkano 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah they will focus on endgame now do I'm sure it will get way better

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

I wish they would charge $20 for it and make the mtx half the cost

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I hated Diablo 4’s story so much. If that game did anything positive for me, it was that it drove me to seek out good palate cleanser games.

[–] desmosthenes 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

this is what d4 should’ve been. (played the demo extensively at exilecon) just as poe is what d3 should’ve been

[–] desmosthenes 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/89c31b94-16ea-42be-b509-27edb44eff0b.jpeg the forefathers of the genre at exilecon

[–] Phegan 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was in the auditorium for this conversation, it was every ARPG i played from my childhood. It was surreal

[–] desmosthenes 2 points 8 months ago

welcome fellow brother 🙏🙏🙏

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I've seen the overseas version of PoE and I'm not really convinced. If anything, Diablo 4 was chasing PoE's success.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s not a success in my eyes. I beat the game, played season one for an evening and said “this is boring I’m going back to diablo3”

[–] Cheems 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oof. I played d3 and it also go very stale very quick to me. I didn't even attempt d4.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I like it because it feels so much faster than 4, and I can disconnect my brain and mono my way to glory

load more comments
view more: next ›