this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
93 points (98.9% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

11109 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BanditMcDougal 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's such a tough call I don't envy having to make. Some of the content created while he was ok is one of a kind. I'm picturing the interview he had with Quyen Tran where she shared her and Sam's 9/11 story. We're missing that verbal history for people to hear, now. Balancing that with not giving him air time, or worse, having to pay out to him must have been an extremely hard decision.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus, I remember when they announced he wouldn't be back for Talks at the start of C3, but I had no idea about any of the reasoning behind it.

Tough decision for sure, but definitely one that speaks to their integrity as creators and as a company. Best wishes to them moving forward, and hope Ashley is doing well of course.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While there is speculation that him leaving was related to this, there's no confirmation, and chances are it was a different reason. Personally I suspect it was related to his substance abuse issues and his frequency of lashing out at trolls online. The breakup and restraining order were both this year, and DV is VERY often hidden in plain sight. Most people who interact with DV victims are completely unaware, because most people who commit DV are very good at being charming when they want to be and the victims are usually too afraid to let the people around them know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't think it was directly because of a restraining order either. That sounds more a symptom (along with his trolling) of his substance abuse problems. CR is very careful about how it engages it's fanbase and he is a major liability to that.

[–] Vaggumon 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering the reasoning, I have zero issue with this. BWF is scum, and a good cleaning of their presence from the brand is perfectly in order.

[–] Brunbrun6766 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't follow Critical Role, mind explaining?

[–] eoddc5 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BWF is Brian Wayne Foster.

He’s one of the (now ex) members of critical role. He was engaged to Ashley Johnson (from critical role, Ellie in TLOU games, waitress in avengers) and they separated with restraining orders because of abuse and general assholeishness.

So critical role is removing him from their content as best as they can so he doesn’t get visibility and such.

[–] Brunbrun6766 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ah, seems reasonable. Would be kinda difficult to just edit him out of it entirely

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Luckily he isn't in the main Campaigns, just side stuff. But the stuff he's in he's usually the main focus (host in Talks Machina, GM in Undeadwood) so it would be impossible to edit him out of those.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't he intro a couple of live episodes? Did they remove those?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, those are the exceptions I think. I suspect that removing them would have caused too much trouble for the main campaigns, because they would have had to explain that there is missing content and why for anyone who would be watching them for the first time.

[–] luffyuk 0 points 1 year ago

Good question!

[–] eoddc5 9 points 1 year ago

Close to impossible of an undertaking if there ever was one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Considering one of the things they are removing is a talk show that he hosted that lasted for multiple seasons, yeah. kinda.

[–] dethb0y 31 points 1 year ago

tl;dr would be that one of the main actresses on critical role (Ashley Johnston) was in an abusive relationship with this guy named Foster, and Critical Role has now scrubbed every notion of his existence from their page by deleting all videos with him in it.

A valuable lesson on the importance of local archiving and not trusting any online source to stay online.

[–] Vaggumon 5 points 1 year ago

Sorry, stepped away to make dinner. Looks like others gave you the reasoning though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Remove hundreds of hours of content because of one piece of shit (and make no mistake, he is a piece of shit) but is still in the pocket of Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Totally understand the reasoning and honestly I wouldn't be shocked if most if not all that content still exists somewhere. I would be shocked if some fan somewhere hadn't backed it up at some point like with the Wendy's one shot

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That's real shame but understandable. Undeadwood was great and the talks machina was amazing compainian to the series although I guess if you are binge watching the series having a companion piece is less needed so maybe they were of their time for speculation. But again totally see why the core crew would want it gone from their platform

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

100% in support of the decision… but from a purely selfish perspective I always had the Honey Heist on my someday/maybe catch up list.

Good to see the clear show of integrity from the team.