this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
233 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

1387 readers
397 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Standard of 100Mbps down and 20Mbps up replaces old 25Mbps/3Mbps benchmark.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

About time. Maybe the maps will be updated correctly and people can now see just how pathetic those ISPs have been.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Century Link advertises 12mbps in my town, charges you for 12 delivers 3 with the occasional 6.

I have both T-Mobile home internet and another wireless service. T-Mobile gives me up to 50, but averages closer to 18. The other wireless (WiPower) is 15.

[–] StopSpazzing 4 points 8 months ago

File an FCC complaint. They are required to provide something like 80% of the advertised speeds on average otherwise they can get into hot water with FCC with big files.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Geeze. Where is this? I have multiple gigabit providers to my house.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Rural NM, south of Albuquerque.

We just got fiber, but so far I have not heard from anyone that has actually gotten it yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That’s rough and hopefully these revised maps will start to show that better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Shit. they charged me for 9Mbps and delivered 0.5Mbps when I had them

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

They really should require it to be 100M symmetric. Slow upload speeds make it nearly impossible to use online storage.

[–] jqubed 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m kind of shocked given how historically beholden to the big telcos they’ve been. What’s the status on net neutrality and treating Internet connectivity as a utility?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Fiber internet has spoiled me. 20mb would be unbearably slow, it is shameful that this is even considered to be the standard.

[–] Syltti 3 points 8 months ago

As someone with that backwater standard of 30mb/6mb, a 20mb up would mean I could actually stream at a decent quality or upload videos at a decent rate. Sine I'm already at the bottom of the barrel, I'll take whatever I can get.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm at like 300/10 and it's miserable. I'd gladly go back to 100 down if it means i could also get 100 up. I'd settle for 50 up at this point. Wife can barely stream her Spin/Workout classes (she's the instructor).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i literally cannot get internet slower than 100Mbps symmetric here in sweden lol, astounding that providers in the US are so reticent to improve speeds.

it reminds me of the american rail freight industry, it seems they would prefer to dismantle the entire infrastructure and become investment companies instead..

[–] finestnothing 2 points 8 months ago

Why improve speeds when you can keep the same low ones so charging more for the faster speeds seems reasonable, with the added benefit of not having to upgrade infrastructure for as long as possible! Its even more fun when you get big government subsidies for the improvements and don't pass the savings on at all!

I'm in the US but thankfully I'm on fiber getting unlimited 1000 Mbps symmetric for $65 a month, but my last place was $90 for 1000 Mbps down 10 Mbps up with a 1 tb cap. My parents pay $150 for the same. It's a mess out here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

How about latency?