"Because they consented to the surveillance, they gave up their right to privacy." Its not consent when you put a gun to their head. Absolute disgrace.
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
16 points (94.4% liked)
Privacy
31957 readers
593 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
As messed up as this is, it is 100% the way parole works almost everywhere. Parole officers are not required to investigate or prove their claims.
And this, right here, is the way that rights are erroded. They MUST be upheld protect even the apparent worst of us. This is used against alleged pedophiles because who's going to defend a pedophile? Then, itll be common place to use against all those charged with a crime on bond.
Everyone, no matter who they are, deserves basic human rights.