this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

Cyberpunk

652 readers
12 users here now

What is Cyberpunk?

Cyberpunk is a science-fiction sub-genre dealing with the integration of society and technology in dystopian settings. Often referred to as “low-life and high tech,” Cyberpunk stories deal with outsiders (punks) who fight against the oppressors in society (usually mega corporations that control everything) via technological means (cyber). If the punks aren’t actively fighting against a megacorp, they’re still dealing with living in a world completely dependent on high technology.

Cyberpunk characteristics include:

Prefixes for posts

Icon created by @[email protected].
Banner generated via AI model.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

About a week ago I posted a rumor that Robert Pattinson could potentially play Case in Apple TV+'s Neuromancer series. That series is now officially announced at Apple TV+ but they only named the showrunners (no cast). I assume this means Pattinson declined the role, otherwise they would've mentioned him. Or maybe they're still in talks, who knows. I just think if Pattinson was close to signing on they would've waited to make this announcement so they could include his name.

Also, I absolutely hate linking to twitter, but William Gibson discussed his involvement in the series here. I can't read any of the replies, but someone posted it elsewhere so I assume this is accurate:

“I’m not going to be answering many questions here, about Apple TV’s adaptation of Neuromancer. I’ll have to be answering too many elsewhere, and doing my part on the production. So I thought I’d try to describe that, my part.”

“I answer showrunner’s and director’s questions about the source material. I read drafts and make suggestions. And that’s it, really, though my previous experience has been that that winds up being quite a lot of work in itself.”

"I don’t have veto power. The showrunner and director do, because the adaptation’s their creation, not mine. A novel is a solitary creation. An adaptation is a fundamentally collaborative creation, so first of all isn’t going to “be the book”.

“Particularly not the one you saw behind your forehead when you read the book, because that one is yours alone. So for now let’s leave it at that.”

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blue_Morpho 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm expecting this to get the Foundation treatment by Apple. They will hire some writers who don't understand the book so write their own story and slap "Neuromancer" on it for marketing.

It will be Game of Thrones of the Tessier-Ashpoole dynasty with a side story about a street punk named Case who solves problems with gun fights.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Fair enough. But they will at least need to update or change parts of it, unless they go retrofuturistic with the aesthetics. You can't tell the same story as written while you have smartphones in the world.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 13 points 8 months ago

Particularly not the one you saw behind your forehead when you read the book, because that one is yours alone

I love this sentiment. Seems like a good attitude for an author to have about their work

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm annoyed that William Gibson didn't just post the same exact thing verbatim on his Mastodon account. It sucks that Twitter is still the default place to post things, especially when someone already has a Mastodon account and could've easily used it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think Apple TV has surpassed whatever SciFy has become as the prominent science fiction studio.

Say what you will about adherence to source material, they have consistently produced high-quality television that isn’t afraid to address darkness and ditch the weird horniness of 90’s-2010’s shows.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

idk, I saw the trailer for Foundation and never came back

[–] idogoodjob 3 points 8 months ago

Think the general consensus is it's different from the books but still good. Arguably the best part is original to the show.

It just suffers from the common issue today where all new shows have to be based on some other popular media in order to guarantee initial popularity.