this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
201 points (99.5% liked)

RetroGaming

19667 readers
746 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
201
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by davetansley to c/retrogaming
 

In the UK, we have a peculiar turn of phrase: "to make a good fist of" something. It means to put up a good show, to make the best of what you have, to succeed despite your challenges. And if you ever need to demonstrate to a non-English speaker what this means in practice, you can show them the 8-bit micro ports of Golden Axe!

Neither the Amstrad, C64 or Spectrum should be capable of running this game well. Yet, somehow, they all make a really good fist of it.

But which fist is best?

The arcade version of Golden Axe

Arcade Golden Axe is a Sega classic. A two player fantasy hack 'em up, with three playable characters, some incredibly detailed and imaginative locations and enemies, a great soundtrack and plenty of goblin kicking.

It also came pretty late in the lifespan of the 8-bit micros, around 1990, a time when arcade conversions to the trusty three stalwarts were money generating afterthoughts, intended to milk a captive market hungry to play the big games. It's fair to say, expectations weren't high...

The 8-bit micro versions of Golden Axe

Worst of the three is, surprisingly, the C64 version. But, it's not terrible. It moves well, controls well, and the music is really good. It just feels extremely cut back.

It loses the two player mode of the other ports and generally has only one enemy on screen at once. Some of the enemy and creature placement is different as well. Shame, because it looks pretty nice in motion.

Next - and I'm going to have to ask you to trust me on this - is the really quite good Spectrum version.

Okay, so it looks like a bad Ceefax crash, but if you look beyond the graphics there's something of a game in there.

It feels like Golden Axe. It has the same enemy placement as the arcade. It has two players. It has all the playable characters. It just looks... bonkers.

But the best 8-bit micro port of them all, is the Amstrad version!

It is obviously cut from the same cloth as the Spectrum port, with the same arcade-faithful feel. Two players, all characters, plenty of enemies. But unlike the spectrum, it doesn't look like sick. It's Amstrad-chunky, you know? Colourful, bright, it moves pretty well and controls okay. It feels like a solid attempt that mostly works.

So a rare Amstrad win... among the feeble micros at least!

The 16-bit micro versions of Golden Axe

There were, of course, ports released on more capable systems.

The Amiga got a really good version. Clear, smooth graphics (albeit with quite sparse backgrounds at times) and an excellent soundtrack. In its initial release, it was let down by the limitations of a single button joystick (meaning jump was up and fire), but in this glimmering far future time, we're lucky enough to have the patched WHDLoad version, which allows for two button joysticks and makes the port much more enjoyable! Almost on par with the console versions, surprisingly.

No such luck on the Atari ST, which suffers not only from one-button limitations, but also everything else limitations. It's kinda like the Amiga version but with worse sound (so far, so normal), and has the play area bounded by two large gaudy UI panels. Boo!

The MSDOS port is okay, if a little nimble on my MiSTerFPGA emulation. It sounds good though, and the graphics are faithful. It did annoy me by demanding I produce a manual-based password before I could start the game... I had to find a forum post from 1995(!) to get around it (the password is probably AXE, if you're ever stuck like this!)

The console versions of Golden Axe

Finally, over on the consoles, the Megadrive port is the clear winner. It looks good (especially if you play the colour corrected version), and plays great. A quintessential early title for the system.

The PCEngine CD is, surprisingly, terrible. With drab graphics, jerky movement, the whole thing is annoyingly generally janky.

The Master System is better than it has any right to be. Very playable, but a bit jerky and only one playable character.

The biggest surprise is the (checks notes) Wonderswan Color version. Tiny and faithful, a great port and well worth checking out, should be looking for something to play on your, um, Wonderswan Color.

If you're going to play one, go with the Megadrive/Genesis version.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boiglenoight 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was a fun comparison and reminds me of the old gaming mags with ads that showed screenshots side by side of each system for a given game. There was an ad for Batman: The Movie and I always thought I was getting screwed with only having access to the NES version...

[–] davetansley 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This was especially a problem with for ZX Spectrum owners... they were, shall we say, a little bit reluctant to show Speccy buyers exactly what they were getting.

[–] Boiglenoight 2 points 1 year ago

While the Amiga and Atari (ST?) always had the best looking versions. I had no idea where to get one, much less have the means to do so.

[–] art101 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I grew up on Sinclair machines and yeah the graphics looked like a ceefax page that had died a horrific death but the gameplay was generally great.

Other classic conversions that actually looked pretty good despite the Spectrum limitations and played great were Karnov and R-Type.

[–] davetansley 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did a post in this community the other day comparing R-Type versions... And yeah, the speccy version is great!

[–] art101 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry about that, following so many communities at first after joining Lemmy good stuff dropped off the bottom. Unsubscribed to a few so I can catch what I need.

I'll look up that R-Type post, I spent a fortune on that cab as a bairn I should have shares in Irem.

[–] rezz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] davetansley 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks! It's a lot of fun to dig up all the old ports and play them.

I'm fascinated by the way the older ones in particular were basically completely different games... it's a far cry from these days where the main versions differ only in whether they're 1080p or 900p or something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I love this series of you touring different ports!

[–] i_r_n00b 6 points 1 year ago

These posts are really cool and interesting, thanks for sharing!

[–] Geek_King 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this! I grew up with sega consoles starting with the master system and I had Golden Axe for genesis and loved it!

[–] LordOfTheChia 5 points 1 year ago

It also helps that the Genesis/Mega Drive was designed after the System 16 arcade board that many of these games used (and was also not a far stretch from the System 18).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Both of the people who ever bought the Bandai Wonderswan Color will be delighted to know the Golden Axe port is decent

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Steveanonymous 2 points 1 year ago
[–] EvilBit 2 points 1 year ago

That’s fantastic. That’s exactly the kind of chicanery I would have gotten up to when I was a kid with a PC back then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm inclined to think the Mega Drive port is actually more enjoyable than the arcade version, even if it gives up a bit in terms of graphics and sound. It's definitely the version I prefer to play. It is always interesting, though, to see how widely Sega's arcade games were ported in that era, even considering that they were console manufacturers themselves.

[–] Tum 3 points 1 year ago

Goldenaxe on Sega was one of my all time favorites growing up, though I never beat it. Close second was Revenge of the Shinobi, also never beat it. I know we've gotten a new streets of rage recently but I would love to see a new release for goldenaxe!

[–] Rhynoplaz 3 points 1 year ago

That was a fun comparison, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I still struggle to find a player 2 that can appreciate the glory of Golden Axe with me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

These have been fantastic. I saved up my pocket money and got Golden Axe (I believe it was from John Menzes) for the speccy.

Sega Megadrive port was the best from me though.

Keep doing what you’re doing! All the memories and feels coming back in my old age.

[–] junezephier 2 points 1 year ago

I have zero intention of playing this game, but this is a great comparison that is pretty interesting in how different the versions are. Thanks for putting this together!

[–] ScorpionFrog 1 points 1 year ago

Another brilliant post, I love these. Thank you.

[–] Pumpkinbot 1 points 1 year ago

The ZX Spectrum's color limitations are so cute, lol.

[–] hark 1 points 1 year ago

I'm most familiar with the megadrive port since I played that a ton growing up. When I later experienced the arcade version, I was surprised to learn that it didn't have the extra level and boss of the megadrive version. I'm not sure if the other versions have the extra content either. The extra content puts it above even the arcade version for me, even if there is somewhat of a downgrade in the graphics and sound departments. Would love to see a Streets of Rage 4 style entry to the series. I couldn't believe they'd forsaken multiplayer in the last Golden Axe game they made.