this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
312 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32571 readers
314 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Horrible code. First, it doesn't compile because there's no ; at the end of the class definition.

And then more importantly you have a private destructor which means this CriminalScum's destructor will never be called, so you can't charge it with distruction either. Or are you telling me this CriminalScum has friends?

[–] aggelalex 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There's always an accomplice in crime.

Also, tall order to expect me to run and test a code written only for a shitpost.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

You're charging the class for a thought crime!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also, if I'm not mistaken the uninitialized prop is not guaranteed to be nullptr here, so this private destructor could be trying to free from some random pointer.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

CriminalScrum

[–] desmosthenes 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

it’s not monospaced; my eyes

[–] aggelalex 9 points 9 months ago

Peak shittiness requires sacrifice

[–] ooterness 8 points 9 months ago

STOP! You have violated the law. Pay the court a fine or serve your sentence. Your stolen goods are now forfeit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Right to remain silent isn't granted to criminal scum, they have to either pay the court a fine or serve their sentence, and their stolen goods are now forfeit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I see there an access violation...