It seems that they are just doing this so they can claim they support the open source community. The models they released are not incredibly competitive with many similarly sized open source models currently available and we know they have better.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)
Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence
2900 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence!
We are a community dedicated to forwarding the availability and access to:
Free Open Source Artificial Intelligence (F.O.S.A.I.)
More AI Communities
LLM Leaderboards
Developer Resources
GitHub Projects
FOSAI Time Capsule
- The Internet is Healing
- General Resources
- FOSAI Welcome Message
- FOSAI Crash Course
- FOSAI Nexus Resource Hub
- FOSAI LLM Guide
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
At the very least I like how it's becoming somewhat standard, tho I suspect the reasoning is to minimize their own liability. I see this as a way to defer responsibility.
minimize their own liability
I think maybe that is behind some earlier releases but Google is already operating Gemini. It's not going to help them with liability.
Eventually, the cost of making/releasing these models is simply insignificant. Maybe they hope that people messing around with them will give them tips for Gemini. Maybe they hope to familiarize potential future employees with Google specific AI (giving them a larger and more qualified hiring pool).
They may also hope for a bit of good will, but that may easily backfire.
Thats very possible
From my experience the model is pretty bad compared to both 7B llama2 and mistral. It's also larger than both. It might be caused by bad instruction tuning, but overall my expectations are pretty low.