this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
117 points (94.7% liked)

World News

38556 readers
2908 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FranklinsBeard 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In this context I think it's fine. Russia has already been using cluster munitions on Ukrainians and I doubt the AFU will be as careless and cold in their use as the Ruzzians. Unexploded ordinance is a genuine concern, but the lands being fought for are already so heavily mined its almost a moot point. Just my 2¢

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just that. The amount of minefields that Russia put is astonishingly large and one of the main reasons of why offensive is slow. The main objection of cluster munition is that some of it does not explode and becomes essentially a mine. But it is just a small addition to the existing mine fields, so...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Use the cluster bombs on the mine fields, win win.

[–] Fondots 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I'd obvious prefer cluster munitions not be used at all, but thanks to Russia that cat is already out of the bag and whether or not Ukraine starts using them they're already going to have a big UXO cleanup to deal with when this is over, and since it's their country I imagine they'll probably be a bit more judicious in their use and it's kind of their call to make if they want that on their plate.

If they start making moves on Russian soil with them, that's a little murkier ethically. There's definitely an element of "turnabout is fair play" involved but I wouldn't exactly have the warm-fuzzies about it.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia also sends widely banned cluster munitions to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

US, Russia and Ukraine did not sign Convention on Cluster Munitions.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's crazy to me that we are talking about a counter-offensive. Last year we weren't even talking about a defense at all. Way too go, Ukrainians. Give 'em hell and send back these bastards at home once and for all.

Slava ukraini 🇺🇦

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukraine now has more tanks than Russia (in Ukraine). And they are better too. I hope that some time in future the same can be said about artilery and aviation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukraine now has more tanks than Russia (in Ukraine)

Do you have a source on that? All I saw was a Tweet which took combat-ready tanks on invasion day and seemingly ignored the many tanks which could've been combat-readied in the last year.

load more comments
view more: next ›