this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

1457 readers
194 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagamant 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don’t we already have .local for that?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Dagamant 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Is 192.168.x.x not reserved for local networks? I’m pretty sure it isn’t used for public addresses. That link specifically says don’t use .local for public dns, use it for local mdns.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You get into trouble when people spin up AD at corp.local and then it grows and grows.

Rfc1918 defines 192.168 as internal only, yes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What about all the other weird TLDs that aren't being used? Like .walmart

I would have thought that Walmart.walmart would be a valid link but it isn't, so what's the point?!

[–] reddig33 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Weird TLDs shouldn’t exist to begin with. Just more evidence that ICANN doesn’t know what the hell they’re doing.

[–] damnthefilibuster 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Weird TLDs should totally exist! Just because Walmart isn’t capitalizing on it doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t be able to make hello.friends for my use.

[–] Gabu 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

WouldYouLikeToPlayA.Game .jpeg

[–] damnthefilibuster 1 points 10 months ago

ThisIsALegitWebsite.com.😋

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's so long to type -_-. I like using .lan for that purpose

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Having ones own local DNS-server is great for such, just add local IP and whatever address.

I use .lab as well, but I suppose "s.l" would work as a super short and easily typeable local domain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's my hosting vlan - .lab.lan

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Spooky coincidence. 👻

[–] plz1 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, .lan is way better.