this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
332 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

5487 readers
2518 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 139 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Circles aren't the best shape to illustrate it because doubling the area of a circle doesn't doesn't really make it look twice as big...

I much prefer this: https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn, that's an extremely powerful method of data visualization!

[–] some_designer_dude 2 points 11 months ago

I want to print it and embed it into the pavement on Wallstreet.

[–] Everythingispenguins 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fuck I got tired and quit half way though the graphic.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

If you didn't get past Bezos, you weren't halfway yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I made this little game with the same idea:

https://kksgandhi.itch.io/other-peoples-money

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago

Well first off circles are like the worst shape they could have used

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

OP misspelled "eat" in the title.

[–] AbsurdityAccelerator 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Top 10% of the US population has a net worth of 4 million? That does not seem right.

[–] Ross_audio 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Net worth includes all asset value. Pensions, investments, and property.

That seems about right to me. A lot will be tied up so liquid assets will be lower.

The 50% upwards middle class being $400,000 will mostly be the value of a house.

Very annoying they just specify "average". I'd expect this data to be based on the median values so it should just say.

[–] AbsurdityAccelerator 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even with the value of your house and 401k, it's still very hard to believe. I just did a quick Google search and the 90th percentile in 2001 is 1.6 million, which seems more accurate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The top 10% includes all the people in the top .01% which skews the average higher. You might only need about 1.6 million to be in the top 10% but the average will be higher.

[–] AbsurdityAccelerator 1 points 11 months ago

Ah, that makes sense. Appreciate the explanation.

[–] snekerpimp 15 points 11 months ago

Pit smoked with hickory chips, and a nice Carolina style sauce, that’s how we should cook em

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Holy shit middle class is half a million now?

The days of making 6 figures means nothing now lol.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Net worth and income are totally different. 6 figures for income will give you a multi million net worth with a modicum of budgeting.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 2 points 11 months ago

Definitely a difference. Thanks.

[–] Trollception 2 points 11 months ago

That's net worth, not salary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

So, how do we tax unrealized gains?