this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
221 points (99.1% liked)

World News

38506 readers
2735 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rostad 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In Sweden we are so ashamed of our politicians trying to meet every demand Turkey makes. NATO is not worth it for dropping support for the Kurds.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tbh, Sweden doesn't need to rush. Finland had to, given the location. But the only one who could sensibly attack Sweden right now without ratling NATO would be NATO.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia still has a harbor in the Baltic ocean but they're in no position to do anything to Sweden att this point.

The reason we're rushing is because the government wants to look capable but it's not working out at all for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The reason we're rushing is because the government wants to look capable but it's not working out at all for them.

~~Swedish~~ European government do anything [challenge]: impossible!

Then again I'm from the US when you can count on the government doing something stupid or evil every day. Unless they forget.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean NATO is good for security, but don't you already got Finland as a barrier against Russia? I don't see a need to rush. What's Russia gonna do? Invade via the water?

[–] 332 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple of things.

  • Our defence has historically been coordinated to a high degree with Finland, and with only one of us in NATO it makes this coordination more difficult. So, in some ways, we are worse off than before the process started.
  • As it is now, Sweden is generally not worried about a land invasion. The danger is how exposed we are from the baltic.
  • A large part of why we want in is for continued solidarity and support of Finland. It is much better for Finland if we are in than if we are not.
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an American with a Swedish wife, if anything serious happens in the baltic, I think you can safely expect Virginia-class subs to start sprouting like dandelions.

Sweden isn't in NATO, but neither is New Zealand, and if China started sending boats for unfriendly visits I'm pretty sure we'd tool up and say "What's all this then?!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You’re right, New Zealand isn’t in NATO, it’s in the ANZUS treaty, that’s why y’all would tool up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Gotland, specifically. It is considered strategic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The USN didn't understand Gotland until recently, we've been doing drills in the area now, we took a second but we figured it out.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2022/06/12/swedish-us-troops-drill-on-remilitarized-baltic-sea-island/

We're not malicious or uncaring, just... kind of slow.

load more comments
view more: next ›