this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
221 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39173 readers
3795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean NATO is good for security, but don't you already got Finland as a barrier against Russia? I don't see a need to rush. What's Russia gonna do? Invade via the water?

[–] 332 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple of things.

  • Our defence has historically been coordinated to a high degree with Finland, and with only one of us in NATO it makes this coordination more difficult. So, in some ways, we are worse off than before the process started.
  • As it is now, Sweden is generally not worried about a land invasion. The danger is how exposed we are from the baltic.
  • A large part of why we want in is for continued solidarity and support of Finland. It is much better for Finland if we are in than if we are not.
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an American with a Swedish wife, if anything serious happens in the baltic, I think you can safely expect Virginia-class subs to start sprouting like dandelions.

Sweden isn't in NATO, but neither is New Zealand, and if China started sending boats for unfriendly visits I'm pretty sure we'd tool up and say "What's all this then?!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You’re right, New Zealand isn’t in NATO, it’s in the ANZUS treaty, that’s why y’all would tool up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Gotland, specifically. It is considered strategic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The USN didn't understand Gotland until recently, we've been doing drills in the area now, we took a second but we figured it out.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2022/06/12/swedish-us-troops-drill-on-remilitarized-baltic-sea-island/

We're not malicious or uncaring, just... kind of slow.