this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
428 points (96.9% liked)

People Twitter

5974 readers
1167 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, I see your point, but a shop here sells spaghetti in what's practically a paper envelope and that just feels like the right way to package spaghetti, on so many levels.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now I'm wondering how susceptible pasta is to going bad faster when exposed to light... Are we paying more for worse pasta because of marketing!?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pasta was traditionally dried under sunlight, so I'd expect that to just not really be a thing...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Huh. How about that...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I don't see how that can't be improved by a window. We can do it for real envelopes after all, so that the letters can look out at the world.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's even better than the flimsy plastic packaging that tears just by holding it wrong and you get noodles scattered all over the floor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh yeah, it is rather robust paper in this case. You could probably even dip it into water for a moment, without getting the spaghet wet.

Our plastic wrappings are rather robust, too, though, as most things are sold without the complementary cartons...

[–] LwL 3 points 1 year ago

Everything here except the one expensive brand is just full plastic packaging. The one expensive brand used to have the window, but now removed it for environmental reasons.

When I realizes this I decided to switch to the more expensive brand, even if I'm very much paying for brand name, in the end it doesn't matter to me if a pack of spaghetti costs 89 cents or 2.09€ (even if it's like half my diet), but especially given the problems of microplastic I can't justify buying plastic packaged noodles.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You mean the addition of single-use plastic to packaging that doesn't need it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aren't those windows often cellophane, not plastic?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not that I'm aware of

(Warning: greenwashing link) https://www.barilla.com/en-gb/box

This company states that they used to use plastic in their packaging, so I'd imagine with other brands, it's common as well.

Cellophane by itself does not prevent water vapor from entering the packaging unless coated with highly flammable material, so not sure how much companies use that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No ethical consumption etc

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disagree, you have to remove that window to recycle the rest of the packaging. I specifically look for the ones with no window if possible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is that less work than taking it out for recycling though?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Can confirm. Our Eastern Bloc pasta didn't have windows under communism.

[–] AllonzeeLV 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm willing to find common ground with the capitalists if they're willing to concur that this is their crowning achievement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago