this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
57 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

33632 readers
84 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh hey Tim Cook tweeted a video ad about the nightmare goggles today and the first thing it showed was someone using them to work while barely paying attention to making their child breakfast.

Very cool and good I love capitalism =^)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh gawd no. Please. We can stop this. For our children. No one buy it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You need them in order to be productive enough to keep that child alive.

[–] sangle_of_flame 3 points 1 year ago

cool, now we won't be able to tell where our lives start and our jobs end

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I wouldn’t want to wear an AVP around people, if someone came up to me it would be nice for them to know if I’m seeing them via passthrough or if I’m completely in VR

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think its very odd that they managed to combine VR and google glass to some how come up with something even more off putting. Can't wait to see someone wearing these while driving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's going to be extremely stupid to drive or walk with one of this, no matter what apple marketing is saying, night time vision must suck, and peripheral vision is reduced.

But at the same time there are people playing RPGs or watching movies while driving 90mph in highway using Tesla "full self" driving (then the surviving family has to sue "he didn't know it wasn't an autonomous vehicle")

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, the technology is really fascinating. Virtual objects throwing shadows on the real environment or generating a virtual face in realtime is stunning. But on a practical note, does this keep your face from getting sweaty? Can you wear glasses comfortably? Can you change light seals when they get dirty?

Nevertheless this is in effect just a glorified monitor, but will certainly cost several times more. So I really can't imagine compelling use cases. Especially since you can only use it with other apple devices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The expensive Apple Monitor actually does not cost much more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just interested in seeing what sorts of games someone will develop for this. I imagine it'd be great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

At first, I wanted to reply "Gaming? On a Mac? Get out of here!". But I just saw that over 38k games are available for MacOS in Steam - well, TIL!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

AR stuff is cool, it really is, but this will not be something you wear around other people.

Maybe in many years from now, once the technology has matured to where you can wear it as normal glasses or even contacts, but I just don't think a lot of people will want to use these except as a novelty or for specific purposes like gaming and then they will be competing against Meta which is priced much lower.

I'd still take a pair though if they were sold at a tenth of the price :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a reason you say that? I like the pass through mode on the Oculus Rift S for grabbing my water bottle and what not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's mostly the rendered fake eyes displayed on the outside

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm waiting for someone to make a parody of this so the outside screen displays a blurry porno

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Google glassee? Hospitals

Facebook glasses? A few skaters

Cardboard? casual games for kids

Oculus? Simulators

This thing? Apple futuristic-wannbes fanboys

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I just feel like VR is never really going to be a thing most people enjoy using. People have always used tools with their hands, the smartphone is just the most advanced version yet. Wearing something over your field of vision feels unnatural and unintuitive, and I don't see that ever changing. I already feel kinda uncomfortable even when I just put my hoodie up. What if someone comes at me from behind 🫣

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smartphones are kinda dumb though. As smart as they are they are a tiny screen you need to hold.

Screens monitors tvs pads whatever are just glass that information is beamed onto.

Why not just use that same tech to be that same information in front of your vision. Cut out the middle man that is the phone screen. Isn't that better ?

I'd love to have a heads up display but I don't think it has much practical applications. Can see my heart rate my maybe my speed and my location of I need directions.

This is the same revolution that were phones. People like you said the exact same thing. Be dumb to look at your phone all day. Yet here we are.

Chicken and egg. Need the hardware to start off the software. Without useful reasons for it it will die. Price point too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

There's a big difference there. Before the smart phone we would use notepads. Writing things down on a little pad of paper is something we've done for 100s of years. We just swapped out the paper or booklet for a digital device.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we are still at the very beginning of this technology. People will start using them at home because they are more suitable than phones for some activities, but as usage increases there will also be more research on the subject - so technology can advance and become less invasive -. Once usage increases and the tool becomes less invasive, I see very few barriers to them spreading outside.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they will, maybe they won't. I definitely felt similarly to you for a while, but now I'm just kinda in a phase where I'm seeing the downsides too.

I worry about the mental health of a society that spends more time on a headset than face to face with other human beings. It's already really bad just with smartphones. VR is gonna be even more problematic, people are going to literally get addicted to VR and lose track of reality and go insane. Or at least I could see that outcome as a possibility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the late reply.

In my comment I wrote how I think this technology might spread, but this isn't connected to the advantages and disadvantages I believe it has (rather to the advanced and disadvantages the public will perceive).

I'm quite worried about the mental health consequences too, but I don't think they'll be enough to make us stop using VR if we find it convenient. I just hope for an increase in mental health awareness, so that even if new technologies do damage people will be able to prevent and cure a part of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I already feel kinda uncomfortable even when I just put my hoodie up. What if someone comes at me from behind 🫣

Well, don't go walking around in dangerous neighborhoods with your overpriced headset then :D

Jokes aside, realistically speaking, the usecase is in an office or at home, somewhere where you should feel relatively safe. I get the sentiment though, even the VisionPro is still too bulky and intrusive for it to be something that you wear all the time, even when interacting with others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, this already exists for steam vr: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1844610/Reality_Mixer__Mixed_Reality_for_VR_headsets/

Allowing me to see my kitty cat right next to me on the couch while me head is inside a virtual cinema (bigscreen).

People around me KNOW that I can't see them, because there's a fucking piece of plastic covering my face, and pads covering my ears.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna be honest, google glass was a lot more practical than this, sure google glass was expensive and you got made fun of, but now we have vr headsets for the masses, would a google glass like device succeed if it was under 300$?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...why are there eyeballs on the glasses below her eyes? Like, what am I actually looking at?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Are they cameras?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Can't imagine how obnoxious that must be for everyone around you

load more comments
view more: next ›