this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
533 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5461 readers
860 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wasn't it the force of the ejection seat that pulled it out of it's spin too?

[–] Fosheze 56 points 1 year ago

A lot of times they will eventually pull themselves out of the spin without any interaction from the pilot. The question is if that will happen before the pilot is unconscious or dead from the G forces which is why they still eject when it happens.

[–] ChewTiger 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's true, that's wild. Those seats are insane, it's amazing people can survive them.

[–] Woht24 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't vouch for it but I've read you only get 3 ejections before you're medically discharged because it compresses your spine pretty badly

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't imagine they'd want to keep the guy who crashed three planes either.

[–] ook_the_librarian 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why you throw away half of the resumes from applicants. You don't want to hire unlucky people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, I figure even if they all were 'act of god' type accidents that's the amount of bad luck where you really should start giving it weight. I'm reminded of how the guy who set the record for most lightning strikes survived got really paranoid about clouds later in life.

[–] JJROKCZ 3 points 1 year ago

Yea the medical discharge might just be the excuse to get rid of the pilot that burned half a billion in crashed planes and recovery efforts for them

[–] somethingsnappy 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can think of about 5 very cheap ways this is a solved problem at least at close range. Maybe 1000km.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think if the flat spin was a cheap solved problem than one of the most expensive projects ever undertaken probably wouldn't have it.

[–] somethingsnappy 1 points 1 year ago

Finding the plane seems to be a solved problem. Flat spin not so much.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lmao, I'd love more info on this incident

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago