this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
79 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

1911 readers
466 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LoremIpsumGenerator 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Facebook ❌ Trackbook ✔️

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads is going to be great for the fediverse though, just you wait

[–] Beefytootz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm convinced they're trying to big dick their way into the fediverse and turn it into a tracking fest. My assumption is that they assume having a bajillion forced threads members makes them think they can walk in and take over not realizing we don't particularly care for quantity over quality

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

not realizing we ~~don't particularly care for quantity over quality~~ actually fucking hate them and came here to avoid them.

[–] perviouslyiner 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So they mention that opening any websites in the app results in key-logging including any passwords or sensitive information that you enter into the other website:

https://krausefx.com/blog/announcing-inappbrowsercom-see-what-javascript-commands-get-executed-in-an-in-app-browser

TikTok claimed that the key logger was just an unused debugging feature, while Meta tried to justify it with some really weird doublespeak about 'privacy'.

Lemmy test: https://inappbrowser.com/

[–] extant 2 points 1 year ago

Was TikTok generating this information and sending it or just generating it and leaving it on the clients device? If it's the latter than I buy the story, but if it was being sent it's bullshit. Every bit of data costs money and for an individual user it's fine but for an entire platform this would be measured in millions of dollars. There's no way a company is going to accidentally be collecting all that expensive data just to ignore it.

[–] Mango 8 points 1 year ago

I ALREADY HAVE A FUCKING BROWSER HISTORY. GET A BETTER EXCUSE.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Lovely Zucknail...

I was already warned about the tracking potential way back in 2014?-ish when they launched Graph Search...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Link History also creates a confusing new regime that establishes privacy settings that don’t apply if you access Facebook outside of the Facebook app. If you log in to Facebook on a computer or a mobile browser instead, Link History doesn’t protect you. In fact, you can’t see the Link History page at all if you’re looking at Facebook on your laptop.

Just a pile of dick moves.