this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
1220 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
2206 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The problem isn't where the traffic is, it's where the traffic isn't.

Say you've got 3 lanes into a set of traffic lights and 90% of the traffic continues into 1 lane, then you can add however many lanes you want to the ingress road, but it's still going to fill up and have the same throughput as the bottleneck is the egress.

That said, it can be people doing bad merges, etc. but that's going to happen regardless of how many lanes you put in.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Direct feed highways to parking garages. But as my last paragraph says, LA (in the image) is already too late to fix the problem with roads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Already too late to fix the problems with roads

Given hindsight, you'd install covered cycling infrastructure (to protect from sun) and air conditioned commuter rail, not design the roads to have higher capacity, but not only that but it's also less disruptive to retrofit those than higher capacity roads as you can dig underground without needing large junctions to get people to the surface and convert road lanes to cycle lanes with a roof and wall on one side protecting you from traffic, fumes and the sun... It's a political and cultural issue rather than a design issue.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt 1 points 6 months ago

I think you would still need some substantial space to move things underground. But maybe they have enough. I don't really know. That said, yeah politics. So it ain't going to happen.