this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
612 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18980 readers
5385 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A conservative plan for Donald Trump’s potential transition into the presidency calls for dozens of prisoners to be executed, according to HuffPost. An 887-page plan by Project 2025, led by the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, says that if elected, Trump should make a concerted effort to execute the remaining 40 prisoners on death row. The section’s author, attorney Gene Hamilton, advised that Trump “do everything possible to obtain finality” on the current list of people until Congress forces them to stop. Hamilton is the vice president of America Legal First, a group of former Trump lawyers bent on attacking “woke” companies, headed by Stephen Miller. Trump’s approach to the death penalty stands in stark contrast to that of President Joe Biden, who has openly opposed the death penalty, but done little to move forward legislation to reform or abolish the practice since entering office.

For those of you not in the know Project 2025 is Republicans plan to turn the USA into an authoritarian state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is my primary criticism of democrats, yes

And the troll takes off the mask

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What mask? What are you even saying? You seem to only communicate in cliches

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Typical that you keep blaming others for your own behavior. Just like you have been this whole time.

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <— you are here

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh, are you like, a bot trained on redditor's comments? Is that why you only have old memes to reference?

Like, do you have any response to what I'm arguing besides various iterations of "Nuh Uh!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

do you have any response to what I'm arguing besides various iterations of "Nuh Uh!"

You mean the exact thing you’ve said for your last 2 replies?

Once again, blaming others for the exact thing you are doing, lmao. So predictable…

If you don’t like that your bs isn’t tolerated here, then leave. Continuing to throw tantrums won’t get you any sympathy.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We're both doing now. That's how this tango works.

I pointed out Democrats are not particularly strategic or serious when it comes to wielding both the legislature and the presidency, you didn't have a response to that, here we are

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Once again, blaming others for your actions. That’s not going to work here because we’re not the idiots you think we are.

If you don’t like that your bs isn’t accepted here, leave. Continuing to throw tantrums about it won’t gain you any sympathy.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Really, though, do you think Biden has the political willpower to pull enough swing states? People tend to vote how they feel; keep the incumbent if they're happy, kick 'em out if they're not.

The conservatives seem to think they have this one in the bag, they're already outlining their policy plans, as this article highlights.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You already let the mask slip, troll. Do you think we all have amnesia and forgot, or are you just an AI bot, so you’ve slipped back into the act?

This sounds like a script, lol

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well, I admit I'm enjoying this on several levels. On the one hand, it's funny to collect downvotes. Half the time, it works like a little ticker that says, "Someone has acknowledged what you said, but doesn't have the time or capacity to reply"

On the other hand, I do genuinely enjoy talking about politics. I've been following US elections since I was in middle school. I like to remind people to think about more than this narrow view of this specific election; the reporting and posting and commenting all tends to have such a very short-term memory for these things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

So, you’ve admitted to both trolling and wonton narcissism— of course you still believe you’ve accomplished something here.

Acting like a child throwing a tantrum with an overinflated sense of self-importance. And you’re proud of that, lol. Do you also have your mommy congratulate you on your poops? Lol

[–] Theprogressivist 0 points 4 months ago

Do you also have your mommy congratulate you on your poops?

🤣

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

im just typing

but sure, i'll cop to those labels, if you like. One Trolling, Nacissistic screed, mon sieur;

Let's talk about the Obama administration! What a campaign they ran, and what a voter mandate it got them to boot! Can you imagine if they actually used that mandate? If Obama had actually closed Gitmo and pulled out of Afghanistan, like he had said he would. The lives that would have been saved, the blood unspilled; it's beyond calculable.

And what was his legislative achievement, for all that mandate could have done? He passed the Affordable Healthcare Act. A bill modeled on proposals made by the Heritage Foundation. The very same Heritage Foundation that's giving us Project 2025. Imagine that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Here’s another: deflection. Once again, you attack others rather than face the consequences of your actions.

So predictable.

Are you just copy and pasting from a script or from ChatGPT?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

i'm talking about the article, referencing things in it. Do you often classify conversation as 'deflection'?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

for someone posting on a politics community, you seem to really dislike actually discussing politics