this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
456 points (90.7% liked)

Science Memes

11426 readers
2469 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
456
sweet dreams (mander.xyz)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they don't orbit with any kind of movement then what does that say about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?

We know their mass. So once observed we would know everything about them.

Unless your saying they just some how jump from one random point in that probability cloud to another?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

i'm not sure why you think the uncertainty principle is a "gotcha", it specifically states that you can't know both the position and momentum of a particle and thus explicitly contradicts your claim that we'd know everything about them because we know their mass.

I can't be arsed to write out a whole scientific paper here so i'll just link to the probability cloud model of orbitals and hope you can make sense of that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You specifically said "electrons do not orbit with any kind of movement"

So by your own argument they're not moving. We know the mass. So if we find one by your logic we know everything about it.

Yes that is the probability cloud model well done.

However my point again. You seem to think saying this renders the simile of planetary orbit obsolete. It doesn't it's a simile. It's a way of explaining something that doesn't have to exactly explain it.

If someone said "that fell on my head like a ton of bricks" would you go and examine the object and check it was exactly a ton of bricks or that it exactly exhibited the properties of a ton of bricks?

Or perhaps would you understand something from that about what had happened to them.

You may find this useful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simile